California Optometric Association, v. Association Consulting Group, Inc.
| California Optometric Association |
| Association Consulting Group, Inc. |
| 1:2020cv01180 |
| May 8, 2020 |
| US District Court for the District of Maryland |
| Catherine C Blake |
| Contract: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1330 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on May 11, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 11 Correspondence to Counsel re: Transfer Notification Letter (c/emailed 05/11/2020 ols, Deputy Clerk) |
| Filing 10 Case transferred in from District of California Eastern; Case Number 2:20-cv-00466. Original file certified copy of transfer order and docket sheet received. |
Filing 9
ORDER TO TRANSFER signed by District Judge John A. Mendez on 5/7/2020 GRANTING #6 Motion to Transfer Venue. CASE TRANSFERRED to District of Maryland, Northern Division.(Reader, L)
|
| Filing 8 STIPULATION and PROPOSED ORDER for Transfer Venue by Association Consulting Group, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order to Transfer)(Wheeler, Brian) |
| Filing 7 CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT by Defendant Association Consulting Group, Inc.. (Wheeler, Brian) |
| Filing 6 MOTION to DISMISS by Association Consulting Group, Inc. Motion Hearing SET for 6/16/2020 at 01:30 PM in Courtroom 6 (JAM) before District Judge John A. Mendez. (Attachments: #1 Declaration of Brian M. Wheeler, #2 Declaration of Kevin Hostutler)(Wheeler, Brian) Modified on 5/6/2020 (Mena-Sanchez, L). |
| Filing 5 SUMMONS RETURNED EXECUTED: Association Consulting Group, Inc. served on 3/17/2020, answer due 4/7/2020. (Baxter, Daniel) |
| Filing 4 STIPULATION to Extend Time For Defendant Association Consulting Group, Inc. to Respond to Complaint by Association Consulting Group, Inc.. Attorney Wheeler, Brian M. added. (Wheeler, Brian) Modified on 4/1/2020 (Kaminski, H). |
| Filing 3 CIVIL NEW CASE DOCUMENTS ISSUED (Attachments: #1 Consent Form, #2 Order re Filing Requirements, #3 VDRP) (Mena-Sanchez, L) |
| Filing 2 SUMMONS ISSUED as to *Association Consulting Group, Inc.* with answer to complaint due within *21* days. Attorney *Daniel Lawrence Baxter* *Wilke Fleury Hoffelt Gould and Birney LLP* *400 Capitol Mall, 22nd Floor* *Sacramento, CA 95814*. (Mena-Sanchez, L) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT For Damages against Association Consulting Group, Inc. by California Optometric Association. Attorney Baxter, Daniel Lawrence added. (Filing fee $ 400, receipt number 0972-8769982) (Attachments: #1 Exhibits 1-3, #2 Civil Cover Sheet)(Baxter, Daniel) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Maryland District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: California Optometric Association, v. Association Consulting Group, Inc. | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Association Consulting Group, Inc. | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: California Optometric Association | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
