Thomas v. Fischer et al
| William Thomas |
| Rodney Watkins and Bryan Fischer |
| 1:2020cv01986 |
| July 6, 2020 |
| US District Court for the District of Maryland |
| George Levi Russell |
| Motor Vehicle |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 |
| Both |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on July 6, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 7
Standing Order Concerning Removal. Signed by Judge George Levi Russell, III on 7/6/2020. (ols, Deputy Clerk)
|
| Filing 6 NOTICE of Filing Notice of Removal by Rodney Watkins (ols, Deputy Clerk) |
| Filing 5 ANSWER to #2 Complaint by Rodney Watkins. (ols, Deputy Clerk) |
| Filing 4 SUMMONS Returned Executed as to Rodney Watkins (ols, Deputy Clerk) |
| Filing 3 Summons Issued as to Rodney Watkins. (ols, Deputy Clerk) |
| Filing 2 COMPLAINT against Bryan Fischer, Rodney Watkins, filed by William Thomas. (Attachments: #1 Civil Case Information Report) (ols, Deputy Clerk) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from Circuit Court for Cecil County, case number C-07-CV-20-000114. ( Filing fee $ 400 receipt number 0416-8738561), filed by Rodney Watkins. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1, #2 Exhibit 2, #3 Exhibit 3, #4 Exhibit 4, #5 Exhibit 5, #6 Civil Cover Sheet, #7 Supplement Certificate of Filing of Notice of Removal in Circuit Court)(Stewart, Ellen) |
| THE ABOVE DOCUMENTS (2-6) ARE COPIES OF ORIGINAL PAPERS FILED IN THE CIRCUIT COURT FOR CECIL COUNTY. (ols, Deputy Clerk) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Maryland District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
