Griffin v. Salisbury Police Department et al
Plaintiff: Travis Griffin
Defendant: Officer Garrett Ross, Salisbury Police Department, Officer Joseph Doyle, Mayor & City Council of Salisbury, Maryland, Joseph Doyle, Garrett Ross and Mayor and City Council of Salisbury
Case Number: 1:2020cv02511
Filed: August 31, 2020
Court: US District Court for the District of Maryland
Presiding Judge: Richard D Bennett
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights: Other
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 ef
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on October 19, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
October 19, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 28 ORDER denying as moot #15 Defendants' Motion to Dismiss or for for Summary Judgment; granting #3 Defendants' Motion to Dismiss or for Summary Judgment, construed as a Motion for Summary Judgment; denying #24 Plaintiff's Motion for Leave to File Second Amended Complaint; and directing the Clerk to close the case. Signed by Judge Richard D. Bennett on 10/19/2020. (bmhs, Deputy Clerk)
October 19, 2020 Filing 27 MEMORANDUM OPINION. Signed by Judge Richard D. Bennett on 10/19/2020. (bmhs, Deputy Clerk)
September 16, 2020 Filing 26 Supplemental to #24 MOTION for Leave to File Second Amended Complaint filed by Travis Griffin Corrected Redlined Complaint (Insley, Joshua)
September 16, 2020 Filing 25 RESPONSE in Opposition re #24 MOTION for Leave to File Second Amended Complaint filed by Joseph Doyle, Mayor and City Council of Salisbury, Garrett Ross, Salisbury Police Department.(Levine, Jason)
September 15, 2020 Filing 24 MOTION for Leave to File Second Amended Complaint by Travis Griffin (Attachments: #1 Memorandum in Support, #2 Text of Proposed Order, #3 Attachment Proposed Second Amended Complaint, #4 Attachment Redlined Amended Complaint)(Insley, Joshua)
September 15, 2020 Filing 23 REPLY to Response to Motion re #15 MOTION to Dismiss MOTION for Summary Judgment filed by Joseph Doyle, Mayor and City Council of Salisbury, Garrett Ross, Salisbury Police Department.(Levine, Jason)
September 14, 2020 Filing 22 RESPONSE in Opposition re #15 MOTION to Dismiss MOTION for Summary Judgment, #3 MOTION to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim or for Summary Judgment filed by Travis Griffin. (Attachments: #1 Memorandum in Support, #2 Text of Proposed Order)(Insley, Joshua)
September 1, 2020 Filing 21 NOTICE by Joseph Doyle, Mayor and City Council of Salisbury, Garrett Ross, Salisbury Police Department re #20 Standing Order Concerning Removal (Levine, Jason)
September 1, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 20 Standing Order Concerning Removal. Signed by Judge Richard D. Bennett on 9/1/2020. (c/em 9/1/20 bmhs, Deputy Clerk)
September 1, 2020 Filing 19 Correspondence to Joshua L. Insley, Esq. re: Removal Notification Letter. (c/em 9/1/20 bmhs, Deputy Clerk)
September 1, 2020 Filing 4 NOTICE by Joseph Doyle, Mayor & City Council of Salisbury, Maryland, Garrett Ross, Salisbury Police Department re #1 Notice of Removal,,,, Correcting Typographical Error Referencing Case Removal From Prince George's County - Clarifying Removal Was From Wicomico County (Levine, Jason)
August 31, 2020 Filing 3 MOTION to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim or for Summary Judgment by Joseph Doyle, Mayor & City Council of Salisbury, Maryland, Garrett Ross, Salisbury Police Department (Attachments: #1 Memorandum in Support, #2 Exhibit Ex A, #3 Exhibit Ex B, #4 Text of Proposed Order)(Levine, Jason)
August 31, 2020 Filing 2 Local Rule 103.3 Disclosure Statement by Joseph Doyle, Mayor & City Council of Salisbury, Maryland, Garrett Ross, Salisbury Police Department (Levine, Jason)
August 31, 2020 Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from Circuit Court for Wicomico County, Maryland, case number C-22-CV-20-222. ( Filing fee $ 400 receipt number 0416-8836710), filed by Salisbury Police Department, Garrett Ross, Joseph Doyle, Mayor & City Council of Salisbury, Maryland. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Supplement State Court Removal, #3 Supplement State Court Civil Info Report, #4 Supplement State Court Complaint, #5 Supplement Summons SPD, #6 Supplement Summons M&CC, #7 Supplement Summons Officer Ross, #8 Supplement Summons Officer Doyle, #9 Supplement Line to State Clerk from Plaintiff, #10 Supplement Aff of Service Officer Ross, #11 Supplement Aff of Service Officer Doyle, #12 Supplement State Court Line Entering Appearance, #13 Supplement State Court Fee Waiver Letter, #14 Supplement State Court MTD or SJ (Cover), #15 Supplement State Court MTD or SJ (Memo), #16 Supplement State Court MTD or SJ (Ex A), #17 Supplement State Court MTD or SJ (Ex B), #18 Supplement State Court Response to MTD or SJ, #19 Supplement State Court Amended Complaint, #20 Supplement State Court Amended Complaint Redline, #21 Supplement Local Rule 103.5 cert)(Levine, Jason)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Maryland District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Griffin v. Salisbury Police Department et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Officer Garrett Ross
Represented By: Jason Lee Levine
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Salisbury Police Department
Represented By: Jason Lee Levine
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Officer Joseph Doyle
Represented By: Jason Lee Levine
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Mayor & City Council of Salisbury, Maryland
Represented By: Jason Lee Levine
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Joseph Doyle
Represented By: Jason Lee Levine
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Garrett Ross
Represented By: Jason Lee Levine
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Mayor and City Council of Salisbury
Represented By: Jason Lee Levine
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Travis Griffin
Represented By: Joshua Leland Insley
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?