Aberts v. George R. Norris, Inc.
| William Aberts |
| George R. Norris, Inc. |
| 1:2020cv02605 |
| September 10, 2020 |
| US District Court for the District of Maryland |
| Ellen L Hollander |
| Labor: Family and Medical Leave Act |
| 29 U.S.C. ยง 2601 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on November 5, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 11
ORDER granting #10 Second Consent Motion for Extension of Time to File Response to #5 Partial MOTION to Dismiss. Signed by Judge Ellen L. Hollander on 11/5/2020. (dass, Deputy Clerk)
|
| Filing 10 Second MOTION for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply as to #5 MOTION to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim of Count I of the Complaint (With Consent) by William Aberts. (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order)(Ray, James) |
|
Filing 9
ORDER granting #8 Motion for Extension of Time to File Response to Defendant's #5 Partial MOTION to Dismiss Count I of the complaint. Signed by Judge Ellen L. Hollander on 10/22/2020. (dass, Deputy Clerk)
|
| Filing 8 Consent MOTION for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply as to #5 MOTION to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim of Count I of the Complaint by William Aberts. (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order)(Ray, James) |
| Filing 7 Local Rule 103.3 Disclosure Statement by George R. Norris, Inc. identifying Other Affiliate Packer Norris Parts, LLC, Other Affiliate Berkley Select, Other Affiliate Vermeer MidAtlantic, LLC for George R. Norris, Inc..(Rigatuso, Eric) |
| Filing 6 Defendant's Partial ANSWER to #1 Complaint Count II of the Complaint by George R. Norris, Inc..(Rigatuso, Eric) |
| Filing 5 MOTION to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim of Count I of the Complaint by George R. Norris, Inc. (Attachments: #1 Memorandum in Support Memorandum of Law in Support of Defendant's Partial Motion to Dismiss Count I of the Complaint, #2 Text of Proposed Order Order)(Rigatuso, Eric) |
| Filing 4 Summons Issued 21 days as to George R. Norris, Inc.(dass, Deputy Clerk) |
| Filing 3 Correspondence Correcting Earlier Submission: #2 Correcting earlier submission Second Corrected Civil Cover Sheet (Ray, James) |
| Filing 2 Correspondence Correcting Earlier Submission: #1 Complaint Corrected Civil Cover Sheet (Ray, James) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against George R. Norris, Inc. ( Filing fee $ 400 receipt number 0416-8853764.), filed by William Aberts. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Summons George R. Norris, Inc. Summons)(Ray, James) |
| Case Assigned to Judge Ellen L. Hollander. (cags, Deputy Clerk) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Maryland District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Aberts v. George R. Norris, Inc. | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: George R. Norris, Inc. | |
| Represented By: | Eric Matthew Rigatuso |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: William Aberts | |
| Represented By: | James Martin Ray, II |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
