Witherspoon v. Maryland et al
| Chimel Witherspoon |
| Aramark Food, B.C.D.C., Baltimore Co, Maryland and PrimeCare Medical Inc |
| 1:2020cv03114 |
| October 27, 2020 |
| US District Court for the District of Maryland |
| George Levi Russell |
| Habeas Corpus (General) |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 pr |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on December 8, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 5
ORDER granting #2 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis; dismissing complaint without prejudice; directing clerk to close the case. Signed by Judge George Levi Russell, III on 12/8/2020. (jb5, Deputy Clerk)(c/m-12-08-2020)
|
| Filing 4 Prisoner Trust Fund Account Statement (jb5, Deputy Clerk) |
|
Filing 3
ORDER giving Finance Officer 21 days from the date of this order to file an inmate account summary for the past six month of incarceration and a certificate indicating the average monthly balance in the account for the six month period; granting the Plaintiff 28 days from the date of this Order to file a supplement to the complaint. Signed by Judge George Levi Russell, III on 10/28/2020. (jb5, Deputy Clerk)(c/m-Plaintiff & Finance Officer-10/28/2020)
|
| Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Chimel Witherspoon(jb5, Deputy Clerk) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Aramark Food, B.C.D.C., Baltimore Co, Maryland, PrimeCare Medical Inc, filed by Chimel Witherspoon. (Attachments: #1 Envelope)(jb5, Deputy Clerk) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Maryland District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
