Starr Indemnity & Liability Company, Inc. et al v. Air Freight Plus, Inc. et al
| General Dynamics Information Technology, Inc. and Starr Indemnity & Liability Company, Inc. |
| Air Freight Plus, Inc. doing business as Global Logistics and Direct Distribution & Logistics |
| 1:2020cv03728 |
| December 23, 2020 |
| US District Court for the District of Maryland |
| George Levi Russell |
| Contract: Marine |
| 49 U.S.C. ยง 14706 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on February 19, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 15 ANSWER to #1 Complaint, by Air Freight Plus, Inc..(Herbst, Jonathan) |
| Filing 14 ANSWER to #1 Complaint, by Direct Distribution & Logistics.(Cox, Jeffrey) |
| Filing 13 PAPERLESS ORDER granting #12 Motion to Appear Pro Hac Vice on behalf of Robert G Rothstein. Directing attorney Robert G Rothstein to use the attorney's existing CM/ECF login and password previously issued in this Court. The account password can be reset at http://www.mdd.uscourts.gov/electronic-case-filing-password-reset. Signed by Clerk on 2/12/2021. (srd, Deputy Clerk) |
| Filing 12 MOTION to Appear Pro Hac Vice for Robert G. Rothstein (Filing fee $100, receipt number 0416-9106658.) by Direct Distribution & Logistics(Cox, Jeffrey) |
Filing 11
ORDER granting #10 Direct Distribution & Logistics' Motion for an Extension of Time in Which to File a Responsive Pleading.. Signed by Judge George Levi Russell, III on 2/3/2021. (krs, Deputy Clerk)
|
| Filing 10 MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer by Direct Distribution & Logistics (Attachments: #1 Attachment, #2 Text of Proposed Order)(Cox, Jeffrey) |
| Filing 9 NOTICE of Appearance by Jeffrey Ellison Cox on behalf of Direct Distribution & Logistics (Cox, Jeffrey) |
|
Filing 8
ORDER granting #7 Consent Motion to Extend Time for Defendant Air Freight Plus, Inc. to File a Responsive Pleading. Signed by Judge George Levi Russell, III on 2/1/2021. (krs, Deputy Clerk)
|
| Filing 7 Consent MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer re #1 Complaint, #5 Summons Returned Executed by Air Freight Plus, Inc. (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order)(Herbst, Jonathan) |
| Filing 6 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Starr Indemnity & Liability Company, Inc.. Air Freight Plus, Inc. served on 1/12/2021, answer due 2/2/2021.(Weber, Paul) |
| Filing 5 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Starr Indemnity & Liability Company, Inc.. Direct Distribution & Logistics served on 1/12/2021, answer due 2/2/2021.(Weber, Paul) |
| Filing 4 Summons Issued 21 days as to Air Freight Plus, Inc., Direct Distribution & Logistics.(jb5, Deputy Clerk) |
| Filing 3 Local Rule 103.3 Disclosure Statement by General Dynamics Information Technology, Inc. identifying Corporate Parent General Dynamics Corporation for General Dynamics Information Technology, Inc..(Weber, Paul) |
| Filing 2 Local Rule 103.3 Disclosure Statement by Starr Indemnity & Liability Company, Inc. identifying Corporate Parent Starr International Company, Inc., Corporate Parent Starr Indemnity & Liability Company, Inc. for Starr Indemnity & Liability Company, Inc..(Weber, Paul) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Air Freight Plus, Inc., Direct Distribution & Logistics ( Filing fee $ 402 receipt number 0416-9029238.), filed by Starr Indemnity & Liability Company, Inc., General Dynamics Information Technology, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Summons, #3 Summons)(Weber, Paul) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Maryland District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
