Hochtritt v. National Railroad Passenger Corporation, et al.
| Lisa Hochtritt |
| National Railroad Passenger Corporation and Maryland Transit Administration |
| 1:2021cv00045 |
| January 7, 2021 |
| US District Court for the District of Maryland |
| Richard D Bennett |
| A David Copperthite |
| P.I.: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. § 1441 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on February 16, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 19 Consent to Magistrate Judge (Uria, Carlos) |
| Filing 18 Consent to Magistrate Judge (Heisler, Steven) |
Filing 17
STANDING ORDER Concerning Discovery. Signed by Magistrate Judge A. David Copperthite on 2/9/2021. (dass, Deputy Clerk)
|
|
Filing 16
(Amended) SCHEDULING ORDER: Status Report due by 7/23/2021. Signed by Magistrate Judge A. David Copperthite on 2/9/2021. (dass, Deputy Clerk)
|
|
Filing 15
ORDER on referral for all proceedings re Magistrate Consent form deadline, amended scheduling order, discovery matters, and further scheduling. Signed by Magistrate Judge A. David Copperthite on 2/9/2021. (dass, Deputy Clerk)
|
|
Filing 14
ORDER Directing Parties to Submit Magistrate Judge Consent Form(s) re #13 Order Referring Case to Magistrate Judge. Signed by Judge Richard D. Bennett on 2/9/2021. (cags, Deputy Clerk)
|
|
Filing 13
ORDER REFERRING CASE to Magistrate Judge A. David Copperthite for all Proceedings. Signed by Judge Richard D. Bennett on 2/9/2021. (cags, Deputy Clerk)
|
| Filing 12 STATUS REPORT Joint Initial Status Report by National Railroad Passenger Corporation (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order Scheduling Order)(Uria, Carlos) |
| Filing 11 Local Rule 103.3 Disclosure Statement by Lisa Hochtritt (Heisler, Steven) |
| Filing 10 (FILED IN ERROR-Blank form attached) Local Rule 103.3 Disclosure Statement by Lisa Hochtritt (Heisler, Steven) Modified on 1/20/2021 (dass, Deputy Clerk). |
| Filing 9 RESPONSE re #7 Standing Order Concerning Removal filed by National Railroad Passenger Corporation.(Nosher, John) |
|
Filing 8
SCHEDULING ORDER: Status Report due by 5/24/2021.. Signed by Judge Richard D. Bennett on 1/7/2021. (Attachments: #1 Informal Discovery Letter)(dass, Deputy Clerk)
|
|
Filing 7
Standing Order Concerning Removal. Signed by Judge Richard D. Bennett on 1/7/2021. (dass, Deputy Clerk)
|
| Filing 6 NOTICE OF FILING NOTICE OF REMOVAL by National Railroad Passenger Corporation. (dass, Deputy Clerk) |
| Filing 5 ANSWER to #3 Complaint by National Railroad Passenger Corporation.(dass, Deputy Clerk) |
| Filing 4 Summons Issued 60 days as to National Railroad Passenger Corporation.(dass, Deputy Clerk) |
| Filing 3 COMPLAINT against Maryland Transit Administration, National Railroad Passenger Corporation, filed by Lisa Hochtritt.(dass, Deputy Clerk) |
| Filing 2 Local Rule 103.3 Disclosure Statement by NATIONAL RAILROAD PASSENGER CORPORATION (Nosher, John) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from Circuit Court for Baltimore City, case number 24-C-20-004812. ( Filing fee $ 402 receipt number 0416-9048355), filed by NATIONAL RAILROAD PASSENGER CORPORATION. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Summons, #3 Attachment Complaint, #4 Attachment Answer, #5 Attachment Not of Filing of Not of Removal)(Nosher, John) |
| Case Assigned to Judge Richard D. Bennett. (ko, Deputy Clerk) |
| THE ABOVE DOCUMENTS (3-6) ARE COPIES OF ORIGINAL PAPERS FILED IN THE CIRCUIT COURT FOR BALTIMORE CITY. (dass, Deputy Clerk) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Maryland District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
