Erwin v. Saul
| Stephanie Erwin |
| Andrew Saul |
| SSA Notify |
| 1:2021cv00221 |
| January 26, 2021 |
| US District Court for the District of Maryland |
| Deborah L. Boardman |
| Catherine C Blake |
| Social Security: DIWC/DIWW |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 405 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on February 1, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 7 Summons Issued 60 days as to Andrew Saul, U.S. Attorney and U.S. Attorney General(bmhs, Deputy Clerk) (Additional attachment(s) added on 2/1/2021: #1 Summons) (bmhs, Deputy Clerk). |
Filing 6
ORDER granting #2 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis. Signed by Magistrate Judge Deborah L. Boardman on 2/1/2021. (bmhs, Deputy Clerk)
|
|
Filing 5
ORDER REFERRING CASE to Magistrate Judge Deborah L. Boardman for all Proceedings. Signed by Judge Catherine C. Blake on 1/27/2021. (cags, Deputy Clerk)
|
| Filing 4 PAPERLESS NOTICE of Appearance and Consent to Magistrate Judge by Kelly M Marzullo on behalf of Andrew Saul. (bmhs, Deputy Clerk) |
| Filing 3 Consent to Magistrate Judge (Piazza, Vincent) |
| Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Stephanie Erwin (Attachments: #1 Affidavit)(Piazza, Vincent) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Andrew Saul, Commissioner of Social Security, filed by Stephanie Erwin. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Summons)(Piazza, Vincent) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Maryland District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
