Watkins v. Corcoran et al
| Nafiz Shaun Watkins |
| Steven T. Moyer, Baltimore City, Correctional Officer Estep, The Warden of Maryland Reception Diagnostic and Classification Center, Lieutenant Ahmed, Dayona Corcoran, Shawntina McCall, Synessa Jefferson, Rosalyn McDuffie and The Deputy Warden for Security at The Maryland Reception Diagnostic and Classification Center |
| 1:2021cv00274 |
| February 5, 2021 |
| US District Court for the District of Maryland |
| Catherine C Blake |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 pr |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on February 8, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 3
FILED IN ERROR-ORDER granting Plaintiff 28 days from the date of this Order to show cause why this case should not be dismissed for failure to serve Defendants Dorsey and France. Signed by Judge Ellen L. Hollander on 2/8/2021. (jb5, Deputy Clerk)(c/m-02/08/2021)
|
| Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Nafiz Shaun Watkins(jb5, Deputy Clerk) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Lieutenant Ahmed, Baltimore City, Dayona Corcoran, Correctional Officer Estep, Synessa Jefferson, Shawntina McCall, Rosalyn McDuffie, Steven T. Moyer, The Deputy Warden for Security at The Maryland Reception Diagnostic and Classification Center, The Warden of Maryland Reception Diagnostic and Classification Center, filed by Nafiz Shaun Watkins. (Attachments: #1 Envelope)(jb5, Deputy Clerk) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Maryland District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
