Sellman v. Weis Markets Inc.
Roslyn L. Sellman |
Weis Markets Inc. and Weis Markets, Inc. |
1:2021cv00408 |
February 18, 2021 |
US District Court for the District of Maryland |
Ellen L Hollander |
Civil Rights: Jobs |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on March 16, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 7 WAIVER OF SERVICE Returned Executed by Roslyn L. Sellman. (NDE FAH, JOSEPH MITTERAND) |
Filing 6 NOTICE of Appearance by Michael A Graziano on behalf of Weis Markets, Inc. (Graziano, Michael) |
Filing 5 SUMMONS Returned Executed Weis Markets, Inc. served on 2/25/2021, answer due 3/18/2021.(krs, Deputy Clerk) |
Filing 4 NOTICE (Exhibit to Complaint) by Roslyn L. Sellman re #1 Complaint (NDE FAH, JOSEPH MITTERAND) Modified on 2/23/2021 (krs, Deputy Clerk). |
Filing 3 QC NOTICE: #1 Complaint filed by Roslyn L. Sellman was filed incorrectly. **File the exhibit using Notice other and linking back to the Complaint. Please do not refile the complaint just the exhibit. Make note that all exhibits should be filed as individual attachments when filing a Complaint.. (jb5, Deputy Clerk) |
Filing 2 Summons Issued 21 days as to Weis Markets, Inc..(jb5, Deputy Clerk) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT FOR DISCRIMINATION AND RETALIATION against Weis Markets Inc. ( Filing fee $ 402 receipt number 0416-9117040.), filed by Roslyn L. Sellman. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Summons)(NDE FAH, JOSEPH MITTERAND) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Maryland District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.