Walker v. Brian Front, Attorney General of the State of Maryland et al
Donnell Walker |
Cleveland Friday, Warden of Jessup Correctional Institution and Brian Frosh, Attorney General of the State of Maryland |
1:2021cv00576 |
March 5, 2021 |
US District Court for the District of Maryland |
Ellen L Hollander |
Habeas Corpus (General) |
28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on November 23, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 5 ORDER granting #4 Motion for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply til the 19th of May 2021. Signed by Judge Ellen L. Hollander on 4/12/2021. (jb5, Deputy Clerk) |
Filing 4 MOTION for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply Motion for Extension of Time to File Habeas Corpus Answer by Brian Frosh, Attorney General of the State of Maryland, Cleveland Friday, Warden of Jessup Correctional Institution. (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order Proposed Order)(DiMiceli, Andrew) |
Filing 3 Correspondence from Plaintiff re: Request for counsel and information. (Attachments: #1 Envelope)(bmhs, Deputy Clerk) |
Filing 2 ORDER advising Clerk to change the name of the Respondent Brian Front to Brian Frosh. Signed by Judge Ellen L. Hollander on 3/10/2021. (jb5, Deputy Clerk)(c/m-03-10-2021) |
Filing 1 PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus, filed by Donnell Walker. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit, #2 Envelope)(jb5, Deputy Clerk) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Maryland District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.