Rouse v. Desper et al
| John Joseph Thomas Rouse |
| Socha, Respondent Superior of Baltimore County Police Headquarters, Judge Ryan, Habeas Corpus Case #D08CR2C513, Judge Thomas Kimberly, Johnson, Cheif Jakaboski, Gary Desper, Gail Watts, M.A. Verch and Judge Tapper 2018 Case |
| 1:2021cv00649 |
| March 9, 2021 |
| US District Court for the District of Maryland |
| George Jarrod Hazel |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 pr |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on March 30, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 5 Supplemental to #1 Complaint, filed by John Joseph Thomas Rouse (Attachments: #1 Envelope)(nu, Deputy Clerk) |
| Filing 4 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by John Joseph Thomas Rouse (Attachments: #1 Envelope)(nus, Deputy Clerk) |
| Filing 3 Supplemental to #1 Complaint, filed by John Joseph Thomas Rouse (Attachments: #1 Envelope)(nus, Deputy Clerk) |
| Filing 2 Correspondence from John Joseph Thomas Rouse (Attachments: #1 Attachment, #2 Envelope)(nus, Deputy Clerk) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Gary Desper, Habeas Corpus Case #D08CR2C513, Jakaboski, Johnson, Judge Tapper 2018 Case, Respondent Superior of Baltimore County Police Headquarters, Ryan, Socha, Thomas Kimberly, M.A. Verch, filed by John Joseph Thomas Rouse. (Attachments: #1 Envelope)(ybs, Deputy Clerk) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Maryland District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
