Murray v. Smith & Nephew, Inc.
Plaintiff: Michele C Murray and Michele Murray
Defendant: Smith & Nephew, Inc.
Case Number: 1:2021cv00810
Filed: March 30, 2021
Court: US District Court for the District of Maryland
Presiding Judge: Catherine C Blake
Nature of Suit: Personal Injury: Health Care/Pharmaceutical Personal Injury Product Liability
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on May 28, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
May 28, 2021 Filing 15 NOTICE of Change of Address by Terri Steinhaus Reiskin Associated Cases: 1:17-md-02775-CCB et al.(Reiskin, Terri)
May 28, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 14 CASE MANAGEMENT ORDER NO. 20. Signed by Judge Catherine C. Blake on 5/28/2021. Associated Cases: 1:17-md-02775-CCB et al.(bmhs, Deputy Clerk)
May 26, 2021 Filing 13 MEMORANDUM TO COUNSEL confirming the schedule set during the conference. Signed by Judge Catherine C. Blake on 5/26/2021. Associated Cases: 1:17-md-02775-CCB et al.(bmhs, Deputy Clerk)
May 26, 2021 Filing 12 Sealed Document (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A-1 through A-65, #2 Exhibit A-66 through A-130, #3 Exhibit A-131 through A-192)Associated Cases: 1:17-md-02775-CCB et al.(Zidlicky, Paul)
May 26, 2021 Filing 11 MOTION to Seal Exhibit A to Motion for Summary Judgment Regarding All Male Plaintiffs Implanted with BHR Devices with Large Femoral Head Sizes by Smith & Nephew, Inc. (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order)Associated Cases: 1:17-md-02775-CCB et al.(Zidlicky, Paul)
May 26, 2021 Filing 10 MOTION for Summary Judgment regarding All Male Plaintiffs Implanted with BHR Devices with Large Femoral Head Sizes by Smith & Nephew, Inc. (Attachments: #1 Memorandum in Support, #2 Exhibit Index of Exhibits, #3 Exhibit A, #4 Exhibit B, #5 Exhibit C, #6 Exhibit D, #7 Exhibit E, #8 Exhibit F, #9 Exhibit G, #10 Exhibit H, #11 Exhibit I, #12 Exhibit J, #13 Exhibit K, #14 Exhibit L, #15 Exhibit M, #16 Exhibit N, #17 Exhibit O, #18 Exhibit P, #19 Exhibit Q, #20 Exhibit R, #21 Exhibit S, #22 Exhibit T, #23 Exhibit U, #24 Exhibit V, #25 Exhibit W, #26 Exhibit X, #27 Exhibit Y, #28 Exhibit Z, #29 Exhibit AA, #30 Exhibit BB, #31 Exhibit CC, #32 Text of Proposed Order)Associated Cases: 1:17-md-02775-CCB et al.(Zidlicky, Paul)
May 21, 2021 Filing 9 STATUS REPORT Parties' Proposed Agenda for May 26, 2021 Status Conference by Smith & Nephew, Inc.Associated Cases: 1:17-md-02775-CCB et al.(Wozniak, Jana)
May 21, 2021 Filing 8 MOTION for Other Relief for an Order Governing Ex Parte Contacts with Treating Physicians in Advance of Trial and Memorandum in Support by Smith & Nephew, Inc. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit B, #3 Text of Proposed Order)Associated Cases: 1:17-md-02775-CCB et al.(Zidlicky, Paul)
May 17, 2021 Filing 7 NOTICE by Smith & Nephew Inc. of Filing Updated Listings Of Pending BHR Track And THA Track Cases (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A - BHR Cases as of May 16, 2021, #2 Exhibit B - THA Cases as of May 16, 2021)Associated Cases: 1:17-md-02775-CCB et al.(Wozniak, Jana)
May 3, 2021 Filing 6 NOTICE by Smith & Nephew, Inc. of Filing Updated Listings of Pending BHR and THA Track Cases (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A (BHR Track Cases), #2 Exhibit B (THA Track Cases))Associated Cases: 1:17-md-02775-CCB et al.(Wozniak, Jana)
April 20, 2021 Filing 5 AMENDED COMPLAINT against Smith & Nephew, Inc., filed by Michele Murray.(Burke, Daniel)
April 19, 2021 Filing 4 NOTICE by Smith & Nephew, Inc. of Filing Updated Listings of Pending BHR and THA Track Cases (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A (BHR Track Cases), #2 Exhibit B (THA Track Cases))Associated Cases: 1:17-md-02775-CCB et al.(Wozniak, Jana)
April 5, 2021 Filing 3 NOTICE by Smith & Nephew, Inc. of Filing Updated Listings of Pending BHR and THA Track Cases (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A (BHR Track Cases), #2 Exhibit B (THA Track Cases))Associated Cases: 1:17-md-02775-CCB et al.(Wozniak, Jana)
March 31, 2021 Filing 2 DEFICIENCY NOTICE - Pursuant to Case Management Orders, please file the Short Form Complaint regarding this case in 17-md-2775. When prompted if you would like to spread the text, please answer no, as the complaint has already been filed in the individual case.(bmhs, Deputy Clerk)
March 31, 2021 Case Assigned to Judge Catherine C. Blake. (ko, Deputy Clerk)
March 30, 2021 Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Smith & Nephew, Inc. ( Filing fee $ 402 receipt number 0416-9192102.), filed by Michele Murray. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(Burke, Daniel)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Maryland District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Murray v. Smith & Nephew, Inc.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Michele C Murray
Represented By: Daniel C Burke
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Michele Murray
Represented By: Daniel C Burke
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Smith & Nephew, Inc.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?