McLaughlin v. Walmart, Inc.
| John McLaughlin |
| Walmart, Inc. d/b/a Walmart #1715 and Walmart Inc. |
| 1:2021cv01305 |
| May 26, 2021 |
| US District Court for the District of Maryland |
| Richard D Bennett |
| A David Copperthite |
| P.I.: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. § 1441 |
| Both |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on March 21, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 17
ORDER granting #16 Consent MOTION to Modify Scheduling Order. Signed by Magistrate Judge A. David Copperthite on 6/21/2021. (kw2s, Deputy Clerk)
|
|
Filing 16
Consent MOTION to Modify Scheduling Order by Walmart Inc. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order)(Alexander, Jennifer)
|
|
Filing 15
Consent to Magistrate Judge (Alexander, Jennifer)
|
|
Filing 14
Consent to Magistrate Judge (Tehrani, Virginia)
|
|
Filing 13
STANDING ORDER CONCERNING DISCOVERY. Signed by Magistrate Judge A. David Copperthite on 6/11/2021. (dass, Deputy Clerk)
|
|
Filing 12
ORDER re Referral for all proceedings; setting deadline for parties to file consent forms; directing #8 Scheduling Order will govern this case; advising of discovery assistance; directing after resolution of any dispositive pretrial motions, counsel will be contacted regarding trial and related scheduling. Signed by Magistrate Judge A. David Copperthite on 6/11/2021. (dass, Deputy Clerk)
|
|
Filing 11
ORDER Directing Parties to Submit Magistrate Judge Consent Form(s) re #10 Order Referring Case to Magistrate Judge. Signed by Judge Richard D. Bennett on 6/11/2021. (kns, Deputy Clerk)
|
|
Filing 10
ORDER REFERRING CASE to Magistrate Judge A. David Copperthite for All Further Proceedings. Signed by Judge Richard D. Bennett on 6/11/2021. (kns, Deputy Clerk)
|
|
Filing 9
STATUS REPORT by Walmart Inc.(Alexander, Jennifer)
|
|
Filing 8
SCHEDULING ORDER: Status Report due by 10/15/2021. Signed by Judge Richard D. Bennett on 6/2/2021. (Attachments: #1 Informal Discovery Letter) (dass, Deputy Clerk)
|
|
Filing 7
Correspondence re: Statement Regarding Standing Order Concerning Removal (Alexander, Jennifer)
|
|
Filing 6
Local Rule 103.3 Disclosure Statement by Walmart Inc. identifying Other Affiliate National Union Fire Insurance Company of Pittsburgh, PA, Other Affiliate Wal-Mart Stores East, LP, Other Affiliate Wal-Mart Real Estate Business Trust, Other Affiliate WSE Management, LLC, Other Affiliate WSE Investment, LLC, Other Affiliate Wal-Mart Stores East, LLC, Other Affiliate Wal-Mart Property Co. for Walmart Inc..(Alexander, Jennifer)
|
|
Filing 5
ANSWER to #2 Complaint by Walmart Inc..(Alexander, Jennifer)
|
|
Filing 4
Standing Order Concerning Removal. Signed by Judge Richard D. Bennett on 5/27/2021. (dass, Deputy Clerk)
|
|
Filing 3
Summons Issued 30 days as to Walmart Inc.(dass, Deputy Clerk)
|
|
Filing 2
COMPLAINT against Walmart Inc., filed by John McLaughlin.(dass, Deputy Clerk)
|
|
THE ABOVE DOCUMENTS (2-3) ARE COPIES OF ORIGINAL PAPERS FILED IN THE CIRCUIT COURT FOR TALBOT COUNTY. (dass, Deputy Clerk)
|
|
Filing 1
NOTICE OF REMOVAL from Circuit Court for Talbot County, case number C-20-CV-21-000027. ( Filing fee $ 402 receipt number 0416-9297538), filed by Walmart, Inc. d/b/a Walmart #1715. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1 (State Court Complaint), #2 Exhibit 2 (State Court Writ of Summons), #3 Exhibit 3 (State Court Civil Information Report), #4 Civil Cover Sheet)(Alexander, Jennifer)
|
|
Case Assigned to Judge Richard D. Bennett. (kos, Deputy Clerk)
|
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Maryland District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
