Maggio v. Saul
Plaintiff: Peter George Maggio
Defendant: Andrew M. Saul
Interested Party: SSA Notify
Case Number: 1:2021cv01392
Filed: June 4, 2021
Court: US District Court for the District of Maryland
Presiding Judge: Deborah L. Boardman
Referring Judge: J Mark Coulson
Nature of Suit: Social Security: DIWC/DIWW
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 405
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on June 30, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
June 30, 2021 Case Reassigned to Magistrate Judge J. Mark Coulson. Magistrate Judge Deborah L. Mag. Boardman no longer assigned to the case. (kns, Deputy Clerk)
June 24, 2021 CIVIL CASE FILING FEE: $ 402, receipt number 0416-9344363(Melanson, Theodore)
June 23, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 6 ORDER denying #5 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis; and granting Plaintiff 30 days to submit a $402 filing fee. Signed by Magistrate Judge Deborah L. Boardman on 6/23/2021. (bmhs, Deputy Clerk)
June 4, 2021 Filing 5 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Peter George Maggio(Melanson, Theodore)
June 4, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 4 PAPERLESS ORDER: In accordance with 28 USC 636(c), all parties have voluntarily consented to have Magistrate Judge Deborah Boardman conduct all further proceedings in this case, including trial and entry of final judgment, and conduct all post-judgment proceedings, with direct review by the Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals, if an appeal is filed. Signed by Magistrate Judge Deborah L. Boardman on 6/4/2021. (ko, Deputy Clerk)
June 4, 2021 Filing 3 PAPERLESS NOTICE of Appearance and Consent to Magistrate Judge by Kelly M Marzullo on behalf of Andrew M. Saul. A certified copy of the transcript of the record is due in 60 days unless otherwise ordered. (ko, Deputy Clerk)
June 4, 2021 Filing 2 Consent to Magistrate Judge (Melanson, Theodore)
June 4, 2021 Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Andrew M. Saul, filed by Peter George Maggio. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(Melanson, Theodore)
June 4, 2021 The case of Maggio v. Saul, has been opened in the District of Maryland. The case number is 21cv1392-DLB. PLEASE NOTE: You must pay the case filing fee within 48 hours. To pay online, select the event Civil Case Filing Fee which is found under Civil Events --> Other Filings --> Other Documents. Otherwise, forward a check made payable to Clerk, U.S. District Court and note the assigned case number on the check or cover letter. (ko, Deputy Clerk)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Maryland District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Maggio v. Saul
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Interested party: SSA Notify
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Andrew M. Saul
Represented By: Kelly M Marzullo
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Peter George Maggio
Represented By: Theodore Anthony Melanson
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?