Thompson v. Saul
| Donald Thompson |
| Andrew Saul |
| SSA Notify |
| 1:2021cv01515 |
| June 18, 2021 |
| US District Court for the District of Maryland |
| Deborah L. Boardman |
| J Mark Coulson |
| Social Security: DIWC/DIWW |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 405 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on June 30, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Case Reassigned to Magistrate Judge J. Mark Coulson. Magistrate Judge Deborah L. Mag. Boardman no longer assigned to the case. (kns, Deputy Clerk) |
Filing 4
PAPERLESS ORDER: In accordance with 28 USC 636(c), all parties have voluntarily consented to have Magistrate Judge Boardman conduct all further proceedings in this case, including trial and entry of final judgment, and conduct all post-judgment proceedings, with direct review by the Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals, if an appeal is filed. Signed by Magistrate Judge Deborah L. Boardman on 6/21/2021. (slss, Deputy Clerk)
|
| Filing 3 PAPERLESS NOTICE of Appearance and Consent to Magistrate Judge by Kelly M Marzullo on behalf of Andrew Saul. A certified copy of the transcript of the record is due in 60 days unless otherwise ordered. (slss, Deputy Clerk) |
| Filing 2 Consent to Magistrate Judge (Lieberman, Jordan) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Andrew Saul ( Filing fee $ 402 receipt number 0416-9336168.), filed by Donald Thompson. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(Lieberman, Jordan) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Maryland District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
