Tran v. TFI 21 S.E.C. et al
| Nhan Tran |
| TFI 21 S.E.C. doing business as McArthur Express, Dragos Alexandru Ureche and Matthew Glascoe |
| TFI 21 S.E.C. |
| 1:2021cv02041 |
| August 12, 2021 |
| US District Court for the District of Maryland |
| James K Bredar |
| Motor Vehicle |
| 28 U.S.C. § 1441 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on September 21, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 16
ORDER granting #15 Plaintiffs' Motion for Alternative Service. Signed by Chief Judge James K. Bredar on 9/21/2021. (bmhs, Deputy Clerk)
|
| Filing 15 MOTION for Alternative Service by Nhan Tran (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order, #2 Exhibit, #3 Exhibit, #4 Exhibit, #5 Exhibit, #6 Exhibit, #7 Exhibit, #8 Exhibit, #9 Exhibit, #10 Exhibit)(Everett, John) |
| Filing 14 QC NOTICE: #13 Motion for Alternative Service filed by Nhan Tran was filed incorrectly and needs to be refiled. **Each exhibit must be filed as a separate attachment to the main document. It has been noted as FILED IN ERROR, and the document link has been disabled. (bmhs, Deputy Clerk) |
| Filing 13 (FILED IN ERROR) MOTION for Alternative Service by Nhan Tran (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order, #2 Exhibit)(Everett, John) Modified on 9/17/2021 (bmhs, Deputy Clerk). |
| Filing 12 CROSSCLAIM against Matthew Glascoe, filed by TFI 21 S.E.C..(Stephenson, Andrew) |
| Filing 11 Local Rule 103.3 Disclosure Statement by Matthew Glascoe (Murray, Jolene) |
|
Filing 10
ORDER directing Plaintiff to effectuate service on Ureche as soon as practicable and to file a status report within 60 days if service on Ureche has not been effectuated. Signed by Chief Judge James K. Bredar on 8/31/2021. (bmhs, Deputy Clerk)
|
| Filing 9 STATUS REPORT by Nhan Tran (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Exhibit 1, #2 Exhibit Exhibit 2, #3 Exhibit Exhibit 3, #4 Exhibit Exhibit 4, #5 Exhibit Exhibit 5, #6 Exhibit Exhibit 6, #7 Exhibit Exhibit 7)(Everett, John) |
| Filing 8 ANSWER to #3 Complaint by Matthew Glascoe.(Murray, Jolene) |
|
Filing 7
ORDER directing Plaintiff Nhan Tran to provide a status report with respect to service of the Complaint upon Defendants Dragos Alexandru Ureche and Matthew Glascoe. Signed by Chief Judge James K. Bredar on 8/24/2021. (bmhs, Deputy Clerk)
|
|
Filing 6
Standing Order Concerning Removal. Signed by Chief Judge James K. Bredar on 8/12/2021. (bmhs, Deputy Clerk)
|
| Filing 5 ANSWER to #3 Complaint by TFI 21 S.E.C.(bmhs, Deputy Clerk) |
| Filing 4 Summons Issued as to TFI 21 S.E.C.(bmhs, Deputy Clerk) |
| Filing 3 COMPLAINT against Matthew Glascoe, TFI 21 S.E.C., Dragos Alexandru Ureche filed by Nhan Tran.(bmhs, Deputy Clerk) |
| Filing 2 Local Rule 103.3 Disclosure Statement by TFI 21 SEC d/b/a MCARTHUR EXPRESS, DRAGOS A URECHE identifying Corporate Parent TransForce Administration Inc, Other Affiliate TFI Transport 21 LP, Other Affiliate TForce Holdings Inc, Other Affiliate TFI Internation Inc for TFI 21 SEC d/b/a MCARTHUR EXPRESS.(Stephenson, Andrew) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from Howard County, case number C-13-CV-21-000268. ( Filing fee $ 402 receipt number 0416-9432065), filed by TFI 21 SEC d/b/a MCARTHUR EXPRESS, DRAGOS A URECHE. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Attachment Certificate of Filing, #3 Exhibit 1- Writ of Summons, #4 Exhibit 2- Complaint, #5 Exhibit 3- Answer)(Stephenson, Andrew) |
| THE ABOVE DOCUMENTS (3-5) ARE COPIES OF ORIGINAL PAPERS FILED IN THE CIRCUIT COURT FOR HOWARD COUNTY. (bmhs, Deputy Clerk) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Maryland District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
