Sweeney et al v. Smith & Nephew, Inc.
Plaintiff: Susanne Sweeney and Hugh Sweeney
Defendant: Smith & Nephew, Inc.
Case Number: 1:2021cv02501
Filed: September 29, 2021
Court: US District Court for the District of Maryland
Presiding Judge: Catherine C Blake
Nature of Suit: Personal Injury: Health Care/Pharmaceutical Personal Injury Product Liability
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on November 23, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
November 23, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 31 ORDER confirming the schedule set during the motions hearing. Signed by Judge Catherine C. Blake on 11/22/2021. Associated Cases: 1:17-md-02775-CCB et al.(bmhs, Deputy Clerk)
November 22, 2021 Filing 30 NOTICE by Smith & Nephew, Inc. of Filing Updated Listings of Pending BHR and THA Track Cases (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A (BHR Track Cases as of November 21, 2021), #2 Exhibit B (THA Track Cases as of November 21, 2021))Associated Cases: 1:17-md-02775-CCB et al.(Wozniak, Jana)
November 20, 2021 Filing 29 NOTICE by Smith & Nephew, Inc. of Submission Relating to Plaintiffs' Motion for Leave to Take De Bene Esse Depositions [Dkt. 2980] (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit B)Associated Cases: 1:17-md-02775-CCB et al.(Zidlicky, Paul)
November 19, 2021 Filing 28 -SEALED - NOTICE of Filing Under Seal Exhibit 1 to Plaintiffs' Second Motion For Partial Reimbursement of Their Capital Assessment Contributions by In re: Smith & Nephew Birmingham Hip Resurfacing (BHR) Hip Implant Products Liability Litigation re (3247 in 1:17-md-02775-CCB) Second MOTION for Other Relief For Partial Reimbursement of Their Capital Assessment Contributions Associated Cases: 1:17-md-02775-CCB et al.(Jenner, Robert)
November 19, 2021 Filing 27 (FILED IN ERROR) Sealed DocumentAssociated Cases: 1:17-md-02775-CCB et al.(Jenner, Robert) Modified on 11/19/2021 (bmhs, Deputy Clerk).
November 19, 2021 Filing 26 Second MOTION for Other Relief For Partial Reimbursement of Their Capital Assessment Contributions by In re: Smith & Nephew Birmingham Hip Resurfacing (BHR) Hip Implant Products Liability Litigation (Attachments: #1 Memorandum in Support, #2 Exhibit 1, #3 Exhibit 2, #4 Exhibit 3, #5 Text of Proposed Order)Associated Cases: 1:17-md-02775-CCB et al.(Jenner, Robert)
November 18, 2021 Filing 25 RESPONSE in Opposition re (3215 in 1:17-md-02775-CCB) MOTION for Other Relief Plaintiff's Motion To Offer Trial Testimony By Use Of Remote Contemporaneous Transmission Under Rule 43(a) filed by Smith & Nephew, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A)Associated Cases: 1:17-md-02775-CCB et al.(Zidlicky, Paul)
November 18, 2021 Filing 24 REPLY to Response to Motion re (3214 in 1:17-md-02775-CCB) MOTION for Reconsideration re (457 in 1:18-cv-03520-CCB) MOTION and Supporting Memorandum to Exclude Testimony of Professor Stephen Graves, (3197 in 1:17-md-02775-CCB, 469 in 1:18-cv-03520-CCB) Order on Motion for Miscellaneous Relief, (3093 in 1:17-md-02775-CCB) MOTION and Supporting Memorandum to Exclude Testimony of Professor Stephen Graves filed by Smith & Nephew Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A - 11-10-21 Trans., #2 Exhibit B - 10-20-21 Trans., #3 Exhibit C - Heeckt Dep Excerpt, #4 Exhibit D - Doc Request)Associated Cases: 1:17-md-02775-CCB et al.(Reiskin, Terri)
November 12, 2021 Filing 23 RESPONSE to Motion re (3214 in 1:17-md-02775-CCB) MOTION for Reconsideration re (457 in 1:18-cv-03520-CCB) MOTION and Supporting Memorandum to Exclude Testimony of Professor Stephen Graves, (3197 in 1:17-md-02775-CCB, 469 in 1:18-cv-03520-CCB) Order on Motion for Miscellaneous Relief filed by In re: Smith & Nephew Birmingham Hip Resurfacing (BHR) Hip Implant Products Liability Litigation.Associated Cases: 1:17-md-02775-CCB et al.(Jenner, Robert)
November 8, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 22 MARGINAL ORDER approving (20 in 1:21-cv-02501-CCB, 3220 in 1:17-md-02775-CCB) Stipulation of Dismissal filed by Hugh Sweeney, Susanne Sweeney. Signed by Judge Catherine C. Blake on 11/8/2021. Associated Cases: 1:17-md-02775-CCB, 1:21-cv-02501-CCB(bmhs, Deputy Clerk)
November 8, 2021 Filing 21 NOTICE by Smith & Nephew, Inc. of Filing Updated Listings of Pending BHR and THA Track Cases (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A (BHR Track Cases as of November 7, 2021), #2 Exhibit B (THA Track Cases as of November 7, 2021))Associated Cases: 1:17-md-02775-CCB et al.(Wozniak, Jana)
November 5, 2021 Filing 20 STIPULATION of Dismissal Without Prejudice by Hugh Sweeney, Susanne SweeneyAssociated Cases: 1:17-md-02775-CCB, 1:21-cv-02501-CCB(Zimmerman, Genevieve)
November 5, 2021 Filing 19 QC NOTICE: #18 Stipulation of Dismissal filed by Hugh Sweeney, Susanne Sweeney was filed incorrectly. **All documents must be filed in the master MDL, 17-md-2775, and spread to the individual member case. It has been noted as FILED IN ERROR, and the document link has been disabled. (bmhs, Deputy Clerk)
November 5, 2021 Filing 18 (FILED IN ERROR) STIPULATION of Dismissal without Prejudice by Hugh Sweeney, Susanne Sweeney(Zimmerman, Genevieve) Modified on 11/5/2021 (bmhs, Deputy Clerk).
November 4, 2021 Filing 17 RESPONSE in Opposition re (3153 in 1:17-md-02775-CCB) MOTION for Other Relief to Exclude Defendants' Expert Kevin Bozic, M.D., M.B.A filed by Smith & Nephew, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit B, #3 Exhibit C, #4 Exhibit D, #5 Exhibit E, #6 Exhibit F)Associated Cases: 1:17-md-02775-CCB et al.(Zidlicky, Paul)
November 4, 2021 Filing 16 MOTION for Other Relief Plaintiff's Motion To Offer Trial Testimony By Use Of Remote Contemporaneous Transmission Under Rule 43(a) by Phyliss Mosca (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1, #2 Exhibit 2, #3 Exhibit 3, #4 Exhibit 4)Associated Cases: 1:17-md-02775-CCB et al.(Jenner, Robert)
October 26, 2021 Filing 15 MOTION to Strike Irrelevant and Unfairly Prejudicial Image from the Litigation by Smith & Nephew, Inc. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit B, #3 Exhibit C)Associated Cases: 1:17-md-02775-CCB et al.(Zidlicky, Paul)
October 26, 2021 Filing 14 NOTICE by Smith & Nephew, Inc. of Filing Updated Listings of Pending BHR and THA Track Cases (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A (BHR Track Cases), #2 Exhibit B (THA Track Cases))Associated Cases: 1:17-md-02775-CCB et al.(Wozniak, Jana)
October 22, 2021 Filing 13 REPLY to Response to Motion re (2889 in 1:17-md-02775-CCB) MOTION for Other Relief To Exclude Defendants' Expert Brent D. Kerger, Ph.D,, DABT, (2887 in 1:17-md-02775-CCB) MOTION for Other Relief To Exclude Defendants' Expert Daniel J. Goldstein, CQA filed by In re: Smith & Nephew Birmingham Hip Resurfacing (BHR) Hip Implant Products Liability Litigation.Associated Cases: 1:17-md-02775-CCB et al.(Jenner, Robert)
October 22, 2021 Filing 12 REPLY to Response to Motion re (2888 in 1:17-md-02775-CCB) MOTION to Exclude the Opinion Testimony of Expert Witness Harold Pellerite (THA Track) filed by Smith & Nephew Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit B, #3 Exhibit C, #4 Exhibit D)Associated Cases: 1:17-md-02775-CCB et al.(Zidlicky, Paul)
October 22, 2021 Filing 11 REPLY to Response to Motion re (2886 in 1:17-md-02775-CCB) MOTION to Exclude the Opinion Testimony of Plaintiffs' Expert Witness Mary Truman (THA Track) filed by Smith & Nephew Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit B, #3 Exhibit C, #4 Exhibit D)Associated Cases: 1:17-md-02775-CCB et al.(Zidlicky, Paul)
October 22, 2021 Filing 10 REPLY to Response to Motion re (2891 in 1:17-md-02775-CCB) MOTION to Exclude the Opinion Testimony of Plaintiffs' Expert Witness Dr. Jeffrey Shapiro (THA Track) filed by Smith & Nephew Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A)Associated Cases: 1:17-md-02775-CCB et al.(Zidlicky, Paul)
October 21, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 9 ORDER directing the plaintiff's to respond to 2762 defendant's motion for summary judgment. Signed by Judge Catherine C. Blake on 10/21/2021. Associated Cases: 1:17-md-02775-CCB et al.(bmhs, Deputy Clerk)
October 15, 2021 Filing 8 RESPONSE to Motion re (2762 in 1:17-md-02775-CCB) MOTION for Summary Judgment regarding All Male Plaintiffs Implanted with BHR Devices with Large Femoral Head Sizes Plaintiffs' Position Statement on Male Patients With Non-Recalled Femoral Heads filed by In re: Smith & Nephew Birmingham Hip Resurfacing (BHR) Hip Implant Products Liability Litigation. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit B, #3 Exhibit C, #4 Exhibit D, #5 Exhibit E)Associated Cases: 1:17-md-02775-CCB et al.(Jenner, Robert)
October 13, 2021 Filing 7 MOTION for Other Relief to Exclude Defendants' Expert Kevin Bozic, M.D., M.B.A by In re: Smith & Nephew Birmingham Hip Resurfacing (BHR) Hip Implant Products Liability Litigation (Attachments: #1 Memorandum in Support, #2 Exhibit A, #3 Exhibit B, #4 Exhibit C, #5 Exhibit D)Associated Cases: 1:17-md-02775-CCB et al.(Jenner, Robert)
October 13, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 6 ORDER confirming the results of the 10/13/21 telephone status conference. Signed by Judge Catherine C. Blake on 10/13/2021. Associated Cases: 1:17-md-02775-CCB et al.(bmhs, Deputy Clerk)
October 11, 2021 Filing 5 NOTICE by Smith & Nephew, Inc. of Filing Updated Listings of Pending BHR and THA Track Cases (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A (BHR Track Cases), #2 Exhibit B (THA Track Cases)Associated Cases: 1:17-md-02775-CCB et al.(Wozniak, Jana)
October 11, 2021 Filing 4 REPLY to Response to Motion re (2980 in 1:17-md-02775-CCB, 433 in 1:18-cv-03520-CCB) MOTION for Other Relief Plaintiffs' Motion for Leave to Take De Bene Esse Deposition of Tim Band and S&N Corporate Representative in Advance of Trial Plaintiffs' Reply in Support of Motion for Leave to Take De Bene Esse Deposition of Tim Band and S&N Corporate Representative filed by Phyliss Mosca.Associated Cases: 1:17-md-02775-CCB et al.(Jenner, Robert)
October 11, 2021 Filing 3 -SEALED-RESPONSE to Motion re (457 in 1:18-cv-03520-CCB, 3093 in 1:17-md-02775-CCB) MOTION and Supporting Memorandum to Exclude Testimony of Professor Stephen Graves filed by Phyliss Mosca. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit B)Associated Cases: 1:17-md-02775-CCB et al.(Jenner, Robert)
October 6, 2021 Filing 2 RESPONSE in Opposition re (3036 in 1:17-md-02775-CCB) MOTION for Other Relief Plaintiffs' Revised Motion to Activate Case-Specific Discovery For Remand And Trial filed by Smith & Nephew Inc..Associated Cases: 1:17-md-02775-CCB et al.(Reiskin, Terri)
September 30, 2021 Case Assigned to Judge Catherine C. Blake. (ko, Deputy Clerk)
September 29, 2021 Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Smith & Nephew, Inc. ( Filing fee $ 402 receipt number 0416-9521980.), filed by Susanne Sweeney, Hugh Sweeney. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(Zimmerman, Genevieve)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Maryland District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Sweeney et al v. Smith & Nephew, Inc.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Susanne Sweeney
Represented By: Genevieve M Zimmerman
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Hugh Sweeney
Represented By: Genevieve M Zimmerman
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Smith & Nephew, Inc.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?