Hoffman v. Pinsky, et al.
| William Hoffman |
| Joel P. Pinsky and Public Tax Preparation, Ltd |
| 1:2021cv02575 |
| October 7, 2021 |
| US District Court for the District of Maryland |
| Richard D Bennett |
| Contract: Recovery/Enforcement |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on November 15, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 18 Correspondence re: Receipt of Remand. (dass, Deputy Clerk) |
| Filing 17 Correspondence to Clerk of Circuit Court for Baltimore County re: Remand of Case. (dass, Deputy Clerk) |
Filing 16
ORDER granting #14 Joint Motion to Remand to State Court. Signed by Judge Richard D. Bennett on 11/4/2021. (dass, Deputy Clerk)
|
| Filing 15 Substantive legal issues - addressing (Rudow, William) |
| Filing 14 MOTION to Remand to State Court by William Hoffman (Attachments: #1 Memorandum in Support, #2 Text of Proposed Order)(Heyman, William) |
| Filing 13 NOTICE of Appearance by William Stuart Heyman on behalf of William Hoffman (Heyman, William) |
| Filing 12 NOTICE by Joel P. Pinsky, Public Tax Preparation, Ltd re #7 Standing Order Concerning Removal - Statement (Rudow, William) |
| Filing 11 Supplemental to #7 Standing Order Concerning Removal filed by Joel P. Pinsky, Public Tax Preparation, Ltd - Certificate of Service (Rudow, William) |
| Filing 10 Supplemental to #9 MOTION to Strike #4 Complaint filed by Joel P. Pinsky, Public Tax Preparation, Ltd Proposed Order (Attachments: #1 Supplement Certificate of Service)(Rudow, William) |
| Filing 9 MOTION to Strike #4 Complaint by Joel P. Pinsky, Public Tax Preparation, Ltd (Attachments: #1 Memorandum in Support, #2 Exhibit 1, #3 Exhibit 2 - Affidavit, #4 Exhibit 3, #5 Exhibit 4, #6 Exhibit 5, #7 Exhibit 6)(Rudow, William) |
| Filing 8 Supplemental to #2 Answer to Complaint, Counterclaim filed by Joel P. Pinsky, Public Tax Preparation, Ltd (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Counterclaim Exhibit 2, #2 Exhibit Counterclaim Exhibit 3, #3 Attachment Certificate of Service)(Rudow, William) |
|
Filing 7
Standing Order Concerning Removal. Signed by Judge Richard D. Bennett on 10/7/2021. (dass, Deputy Clerk)
|
|
Filing 6
(FILED IN ERROR- No Document Attached) Standing Order Concerning Removal. Signed by Judge Richard D. Bennett on 10/7/2021. (dass, Deputy Clerk) Modified on 10/7/2021 (dass, Deputy Clerk).
|
| Filing 5 Summons Issued 30 days as to Joel P. Pinsky. (dass, Deputy Clerk) |
| Filing 4 COMPLAINT against Joel P. Pinsky, Public Tax Preparation, Ltd, filed by William Hoffman. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Case Infomration Sheet)(dass, Deputy Clerk) |
| Filing 3 Local Rule 103.3 Disclosure Statement by Public Tax Preparation, Ltd (Rudow, William) |
| Filing 2 ANSWER to Complaint , COUNTERCLAIM against William Hoffman by Joel P. Pinsky, Public Tax Preparation, Ltd. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(Rudow, William) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from Baltimore County Circuit Court of Maryland, case number C-03-CV-21-002745., filed by Public Tax Preparation, Ltd. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Complaint, #2 Exhibit Summons, #3 Exhibit Complaint Exhibit A, #4 Exhibit Plaintiff State Court Civil Cover Sheet, #5 Exhibit State Court Civil Cover Sheet - Unexecuted, #6 Exhibit Docket Sheet)(Rudow, William) |
| THE ABOVE DOCUMENTS (4-5) ARE COPIES OF ORIGINAL PAPERS FILED IN THE CIRCUIT COURT FOR BALTIMORE COUNTY. (dass, Deputy Clerk) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Maryland District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
