Schultz v. MTM Development No. 2 LLC et al
| Jennifer Elizabeth Schultz |
| MTM Development No. 2 LLC Defendant doing business as Ledo Pizza Severn Park and Ledo Pizza System, Inc. |
| 1:2021cv02721 |
| October 22, 2021 |
| US District Court for the District of Maryland |
| Lydia Kay Griggsby |
| Civil Rights: Jobs |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on December 10, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 15
SCHEDULING ORDER: Initial Scheduling Conference set for 1/20/2022 at 11:00 AM in Chambers (telephonic) before Judge Lydia Kay Griggsby. Post-discovery joint status report due by 5/26/2022. Signed by Judge Lydia Kay Griggsby on 12/10/2021. (rs7s, Chambers)
|
| Filing 14 NOTICE of Appearance by Teresa D Teare on behalf of MTM Development No. 2 LLC (Teare, Teresa) |
| Filing 13 Local Rule 103.3 Disclosure Statement by MTM Development No. 2 LLC identifying Other Affiliate CHUBB Group of Insurance Companies for MTM Development No. 2 LLC.(Yu Welsh, Veronica) |
| Filing 12 QC NOTICE: #11 Local Rule 103.3 Disclosure Statement filed by Ledo Pizza System, Inc., MTM Development No. 2 LLC was filed incorrectly. **Please refile the Local Rule 103.3 Disclosure Statement. Everyone designated on your disclosure statement as having financial interest in the outcome of the case needs to be added as a corporate parent or other affiliate when the system prompts you. It has been noted as FILED IN ERROR, and the document link has been disabled. (bmhs, Deputy Clerk) |
| Filing 11 (FILED IN ERROR) Local Rule 103.3 Disclosure Statement by Ledo Pizza System, Inc., MTM Development No. 2 LLC (Yu Welsh, Veronica) Modified on 11/23/2021 (bmhs, Deputy Clerk). |
| Deficiency Notice to Ledo Pizza System, Inc. and MTM Development No. 2 LLC. Your Local Rule 103.3 disclosure statement has not been filed. The Statement must be filed by 11/29/2021 (bmhs, Deputy Clerk) |
| Filing 10 ANSWER to #1 Complaint, by MTM Development No. 2 LLC.(Yu Welsh, Veronica) Modified on 11/24/2021 (bmhs, Deputy Clerk). |
| Filing 9 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Jennifer Elizabeth Schultz. Ledo Pizza System, Inc. served on 10/28/2021, answer due 11/18/2021.(Baldwin, Rignal) |
| Filing 8 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Jennifer Elizabeth Schultz. MTM Development No. 2 LLC served on 10/27/2021, answer due 11/17/2021.(Baldwin, Rignal) |
|
Filing 7
CASE MANAGEMENT ORDER. Signed by Judge Lydia Kay Griggsby on 10/22/2021. (bmhs, Deputy Clerk)
|
| Filing 6 Summons Issued 21 days as to Ledo Pizza System, Inc. and MTM Development No. 2 LLC.(bmhs, Deputy Clerk) |
| Filing 5 NOTICE of Appearance by Rignal Woodward Baldwin, V on behalf of All Plaintiffs (Baldwin, Rignal) |
| Filing 4 NOTICE by Jennifer Elizabeth Schultz re #1 Complaint, Summons to Ledo Pizza System, Inc. (Riley, Douglas) |
| Filing 3 NOTICE by Jennifer Elizabeth Schultz re #1 Complaint, Summons to MTM Development No. 2 LLC (Riley, Douglas) |
| Filing 2 QC NOTICE: #1 Complaint, filed by Jennifer Elizabeth Schultz was filed incorrectly. **The following attachments or exhibits are missing - Summons. To correct this problem, file Summons using the event Notice (Other) and link Summons to #1 Complaint. (bmhs, Deputy Clerk) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT AND DEMAND FOR JURY TRIAL against All Defendants ( Filing fee $ 402 receipt number 0416-9564719.), filed by Jennifer E Schultz. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A - Charge of Discrimination, #2 Exhibit B - Dismissal and Notice of Rights, #3 Civil Cover Sheet)(Riley, Douglas) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Maryland District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
