Akther v. Blinken et al
| Salma Akther, Richard C. Visek, Anthony J. Blinken, Merrick B. Garland, Alejandro Mayorkas, Julie M. Tufft, Charles Adkins-Blanch, Earl R. Miller, Helen Lafave and William R. Dowers |
| 1:2021cv02916 |
| November 14, 2021 |
| US District Court for the District of Maryland |
| James K Bredar |
| Other Immigration Actions |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1361 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on January 6, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 11
ORDER re #10 Notice of Voluntary Dismissal filed by Salma Akther. Signed by Chief Judge James K. Bredar on 1/6/2022. (hmls, Deputy Clerk)
|
| Filing 10 NOTICE of Voluntary Dismissal by Salma Akther (Mahajan, Timothy) |
| Case Reassigned to Chief Judge James K. Bredar. Magistrate Judge Beth P. Gesner no longer assigned to the case. (kns, Deputy Clerk) |
|
Filing 9
PAPERLESS ORDER CANCELLING Show Cause Hearing re: #7 Order to Show Cause. Signed by Magistrate Judge Beth P. Gesner on 12/6/2021. (hmls, Deputy Clerk)
|
|
Filing 7
ORDER directing Salma Akther to show cause for failure to comply with #Standing Order 2019-07. Show Cause Hearing set for 1/28/2022 02:00 PM in (proceed to the Clerk's Office to determine the location of the hearing) before the Chambers Judge. This Order shall be vacated if Salma Akther files a consent or declination prior to the show cause hearing date. Signed by Magistrate Judge Beth P. Gesner on 12/6/2021. (hmls, Deputy Clerk)
|
| Filing 6 Summons Issued 60 days as to Charles Adkins-Blanch, Anthony J. Blinken, William R. Dowers, Merrick B. Garland, Helen Lafave, Alejandro Mayorkas, Earl R. Miller, Julie M. Tufft, Richard C. Visek, U.S. Attorney and U.S. Attorney General (hmls, Deputy Clerk) |
|
Filing 5
Case Management Order. Signed by Magistrate Judge Beth P. Gesner on 11/19/2021. (hmls, Deputy Clerk)
|
| Filing 4 NOTICE of Case Assignment. This case has been assigned to Magistrate Judge Beth P. Gesner. Salma Akther or counsel for Salma Akther are required to review and comply with the Magistrate Judge Pilot Project Procedures which can be downloaded #here. Pursuant to Standing Order 2019-07, which can be downloaded #here, counsel has 14 days from the date of this notice to file their consent, or decline to consent to proceed before a U.S. Magistrate Judge which can be downloaded #here. To file your consent, go to Civil > Other Filings > Other Documents > 25 Pct Mag - Consent to Proceed Before a Magistrate Judge. To file your declination, go to Civil > Other Filings > Other Documents > 25 Pct Mag - Decline to Proceed Before a Magistrate Judge. Failure to file a consent or declination will result in issuance of an Order to Show Cause. Please review the case management order that has been issued in this case. Magistrate Election Form due by 12/3/2021. (hmls, Deputy Clerk) |
| Filing 3 NOTICE by Salma Akther re #1 Complaint, Summons (Mahajan, Timothy) |
| Filing 2 QC NOTICE: [1-5] Summons attached to the Complaint filed by Salma Akther was filed incorrectly. **Please file corrected summons for each defendant. (hmls, Deputy Clerk) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Richard C. Visek ( Filing fee $ 402 receipt number 0416-9609638.), filed by Salma Akther. (Attachments: #1 Memorandum in Support, #2 Exhibit, #3 Exhibit, #4 Civil Cover Sheet Civil Cover Sheet, # (FILED IN ERROR) (5) Summons Summons)(Mahajan, Timothy) Modified on 11/17/2021 (hmls, Deputy Clerk). |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Maryland District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
