Advance Corporation v. Baltimore County, Maryland
Advance Corporation |
Md Baltimore County and Baltimore County, Maryland |
1:2021cv02926 |
November 15, 2021 |
US District Court for the District of Maryland |
Deborah L. Boardman |
Civil Rights: Other |
28 U.S.C. § 1441 |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on September 13, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 18 RESPONSE to Motion re #14 MOTION for Summary Judgment filed by Baltimore County, Maryland.(Neitzel, Bradley) |
Filing 17 REPLY to Response to Motion re #12 MOTION to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim filed by Baltimore County, Maryland.(Neitzel, Bradley) |
Filing 16 NOTICE of Appearance by Morgan Thomas Dilks on behalf of Advance Corporation (Dilks, Morgan) |
Filing 15 NOTICE of Appearance by Marie J Ignozzi on behalf of Advance Corporation (Ignozzi, Marie) |
Filing 14 MOTION for Summary Judgment by Advance Corporation (Attachments: #1 Memorandum in Support Memo in Support, #2 Exhibit A (with attachments), #3 Text of Proposed Order proposed Order)(Schulman, Howard) |
Filing 13 RESPONSE in Opposition re #12 MOTION to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim filed by Advance Corporation. (Attachments: #1 Memorandum in Support, #2 Exhibit Exhibit A to Memorandum, #3 Text of Proposed Order)(Schulman, Howard) |
Filing 12 MOTION to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim by Baltimore County, Maryland (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order, #2 Memorandum in Support)(Neitzel, Bradley) |
Filing 11 PAPERLESS ORDER granting #9 Motion for Extension of Time to Answer: Defendant's response to the Complaint is due December 10, 2021. Signed by Judge Deborah L. Boardman on 11/30/2021. (lmys, Chambers) |
Filing 10 Correspondence re: Removal Statement (Neitzel, Bradley) |
Filing 9 MOTION for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply as to #5 Complaint by Baltimore County, Maryland.(Neitzel, Bradley) Modified on 11/29/2021 (hmls, Deputy Clerk). |
Filing 8 Local Rule 103.3 Disclosure Statement by Advance Corporation (Schulman, Howard) |
Filing 7 Clerk's Notice of Standing Order concerning removal actions filed in this Court, which can be downloaded #here. (hmls, Deputy Clerk) |
Filing 6 Summons Issued 30 days as to Baltimore County, Maryland. (hmls, Deputy Clerk) |
Filing 5 COMPLAINT against Baltimore County, Maryland filed by Advance Corporation. (hmls, Deputy Clerk) |
THE ABOVE DOCUMENTS (5-6) ARE COPIES OF ORIGINAL PAPERS FILED IN THE CIRCUIT COURT FOR BALTIMORE COUNTY. (hmls, Deputy Clerk) |
Filing fee: $ 402.00, receipt number 14637130467 (hmls, Deputy Clerk) |
The case of Advance Corporation v. Baltimore County, Maryland, has been opened in the District of Maryland. The case number is DLB-21-2926. PLEASE NOTE: You must pay the case filing fee within 48 hours. To pay online, select the event Civil Case Filing Fee which is found under Civil Events --> Other Filings --> Other Documents. Otherwise, forward a check made payable to Clerk, U.S. District Court and note the assigned case number on the check or cover letter. (hmls, Deputy Clerk) |
Filing 4 NOTICE by Md Baltimore County re #1 Notice of Removal Civil Cover Sheet (Neitzel, Bradley) |
Filing 3 Local Rule 103.3 Disclosure Statement by Md Baltimore County (Neitzel, Bradley) |
Filing 2 Local Rule 103.5(a)(Neitzel, Bradley) |
Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from Baltimore County Circuit Court, case number C-03-CV-21-003287., filed by Md Baltimore County. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit B, #3 Exhibit C)(Neitzel, Bradley) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Maryland District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.