Kozicki v. Smith & Nephew, Inc.
Plaintiff: Zigmond A. Kozicki
Defendant: Smith & Nephew, Inc.
Case Number: 1:2021cv03045
Filed: November 29, 2021
Court: US District Court for the District of Maryland
Presiding Judge: Catherine C Blake
Nature of Suit: Personal Inj. Prod. Liability
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on January 25, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
January 25, 2022 Filing 20 Memorandum re (561 in 1:17-cv-01077-CCB) MOTION for Other Relief Plaintiffs' Revised Motion to Activate Case-Specific Discovery For Remand And Trial Plaintiffs' Supplemental Memorandum in Support of Plaintiffs' Motion to Activate Case-Specific Discovery For Remand and Trial filed by In re: Smith & Nephew Birmingham Hip Resurfacing (BHR) Hip Implant Products Liability Litigation. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1, #2 Exhibit 2)Associated Cases: 1:17-md-02775-CCB et al.(Jenner, Robert)
January 18, 2022 Filing 19 NOTICE by Smith & Nephew, Inc. of Filing Updated Listings of Pending BHR and THA Track Cases (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A (BHR Track Cases), #2 Exhibit B (THA Track Cases))Associated Cases: 1:17-md-02775-CCB et al.(Wozniak, Jana)
January 6, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 18 ORDER confirming the results of yesterday's conference call. Signed by Judge Catherine C. Blake on 1/6/2022. Associated Cases: 1:17-md-02775-CCB et al.(bmhs, Deputy Clerk)
January 3, 2022 Filing 17 NOTICE by Smith & Nephew, Inc. of Filing Updated Listings of BHR and THA Track Cases (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A (BHR Track Cases), #2 Exhibit B (THA Track Cases))Associated Cases: 1:17-md-02775-CCB et al.(Wozniak, Jana)
December 30, 2021 Filing 16 NOTICE by In re: Smith & Nephew Birmingham Hip Resurfacing (BHR) Hip Implant Products Liability Litigation Plaintiffs' Proposed Bellwether Trial and Case-Specific Discovery Action Plan (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1, #2 Exhibit 2)Associated Cases: 1:17-md-02775-CCB et al.(Jenner, Robert)
December 30, 2021 Filing 15 REPLY to Response to Motion re (2762 in 1:17-md-02775-CCB) MOTION for Summary Judgment regarding All Male Plaintiffs Implanted with BHR Devices with Large Femoral Head Sizes filed by Smith & Nephew, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Index of Exhibits, #2 Exhibit A, #3 Exhibit B, #4 Exhibit C, #5 Exhibit D, #6 Exhibit E, #7 Exhibit F, #8 Exhibit G, #9 Exhibit H, #10 Exhibit I, #11 Exhibit J, #12 Exhibit K, #13 Exhibit L, #14 Exhibit M)Associated Cases: 1:17-md-02775-CCB et al.(Zidlicky, Paul)
December 22, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 14 ORDER directing that Smith & Nephew, Inc. shall file its Answers to the THA MACC and the R3 MACC by no later than January 18, 2022. Signed by Judge Catherine C. Blake on 12/22/2021. Associated Cases: 1:17-md-02775-CCB et al.(kns, Deputy Clerk)
December 20, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 13 ORDER regarding the schedule for a second BHR bellwether trial. Signed by Judge Catherine C. Blake on 12/20/2021. Associated Cases: 1:17-md-02775-CCB et al.(kns, Deputy Clerk)
December 20, 2021 Filing 12 NOTICE by Smith & Nephew, Inc. of Filing Updated Listings of Pending BHR and THA Track Cases (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A (BHR Track Cases), #2 Exhibit B (THA Track Cases))Associated Cases: 1:17-md-02775-CCB et al.(Wozniak, Jana)
December 20, 2021 Filing 11 MOTION for Summary Judgment As to All Claims of Plaintiffs with Implant Dates Prior to October 2009 by Smith & Nephew, Inc. (Attachments: #1 Memorandum in Support, #2 Text of Proposed Order, #3 Exhibit A, #4 Exhibit B, #5 Exhibit C, #6 Exhibit D, #7 Exhibit E, #8 Exhibit F, #9 Exhibit G, #10 Exhibit H, #11 Exhibit I, #12 Exhibit J, #13 Exhibit K, #14 Exhibit L, #15 Exhibit M, #16 Exhibit N, #17 Exhibit O, #18 Exhibit P, #19 Exhibit Q, #20 Exhibit R, #21 Exhibit S, #22 Exhibit T, #23 Exhibit U, #24 Exhibit V, #25 Exhibit W, #26 Exhibit X, #27 Exhibit Y, #28 Exhibit Z, #29 Exhibit AA, #30 Exhibit BB, #31 Exhibit CC, #32 Exhibit DD, #33 Exhibit EE, #34 Exhibit FF)Associated Cases: 1:17-md-02775-CCB et al.(Zidlicky, Paul)
December 14, 2021 Filing 10 -SEALED - NOTICE of Filing Under Seal Exhibit 1 to Statement of Monthly Accounting by In re: Smith & Nephew Birmingham Hip Resurfacing (BHR) Hip Implant Products Liability Litigation Associated Cases: 1:17-md-02775-CCB et al.(Jenner, Robert)
December 14, 2021 Filing 9 NOTICE by In re: Smith & Nephew Birmingham Hip Resurfacing (BHR) Hip Implant Products Liability Litigation Statement of Monthly Accounting (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1)Associated Cases: 1:17-md-02775-CCB et al.(Jenner, Robert)
December 14, 2021 Filing 8 NOTICE by In re: Smith & Nephew Birmingham Hip Resurfacing (BHR) Hip Implant Products Liability Litigation Notice of Quarterly Reported Settlements (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1)Associated Cases: 1:17-md-02775-CCB et al.(Jenner, Robert)
December 13, 2021 Filing 7 -SEALED-RESPONSE to Motion re (446 in 1:17-cv-02722-CCB, 2762 in 1:17-md-02775-CCB) MOTION for Summary Judgment regarding All Male Plaintiffs Implanted with BHR Devices with Large Femoral Head Sizes filed by In re: Smith & Nephew Birmingham Hip Resurfacing (BHR) Hip Implant Products Liability Litigation. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit B, #3 Exhibit C, #4 Exhibit D, #5 Exhibit E, #6 Exhibit F, #7 Exhibit G, #8 Exhibit H, #9 Exhibit I, #10 Exhibit J, #11 Exhibit K)Associated Cases: 1:17-md-02775-CCB et al.(Jenner, Robert)
December 10, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 6 ORDER confirming the court is holding the afternoons of Wednesday, January 5, 2022 and January 12, 2022 to hear argument on any Mosca pretrial issues. Signed by Judge Catherine C. Blake on 12/10/2021. Associated Cases: 1:17-md-02775-CCB et al.(bmhs, Deputy Clerk)
December 6, 2021 Filing 5 NOTICE by Smith & Nephew, Inc. of Filing Updated Listings of Pending BHR and THA Track Cases (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A (BHR Track Cases), #2 Exhibit B (THA Track Cases))Associated Cases: 1:17-md-02775-CCB et al.(Wozniak, Jana)
December 2, 2021 Filing 4 NOTICE by Zigmond A. Kozicki re #1 Complaint Corrected Civil Cover Sheet (Davis, Alex)
November 30, 2021 Filing 3 DEFICIENCY NOTICE - Pursuant to Case Management Orders, please file the Short Form Complaint regarding this case in 17-md-2775. When prompted if you would like to spread the text, please answer no, as the complaint has already been filed in the individual case. (bmhs, Deputy Clerk)
November 30, 2021 Filing 2 QC NOTICE: #1 Civil Cover Sheet filed by Zigmond A. Kozicki was filed incorrectly. **The Civil Cover Sheet is blank. To correct this problem, file the completed Civil Cover Sheet using the event Notice (Other) and link the Civil Cover Sheet to #1 Complaint. (bmhs, Deputy Clerk)
November 30, 2021 Case Assigned to Judge Catherine C. Blake. (ko, Deputy Clerk)
November 29, 2021 Filing 1 COMPLAINT against All Defendants ( Filing fee $ 402 receipt number 0416-9627992.), filed by Zigmond A. Kozicki. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(Davis, Alex)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Maryland District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Kozicki v. Smith & Nephew, Inc.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Zigmond A. Kozicki
Represented By: Alex C Davis
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Smith & Nephew, Inc.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?