Peterson, Sr. v. Shoemaker et al
| Robert E Peterson, Sr. |
| Creekstone Landscape Excavating, LLC, Steven Lee Shoemaker and Steven Lee Shoemaker, Jr. |
| 1:2021cv03131 |
| December 8, 2021 |
| US District Court for the District of Maryland |
| James K Bredar |
| Motor Vehicle |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on February 2, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 12 QC NOTICE: #11 Affidavit of Service filed by Robert E Peterson, Sr. was filed incorrectly. **Incorrect event was selected. Please refile using the event under Service of Process: Summons Returned Executed. It has been noted as FILED IN ERROR, and the document link has been disabled. (bmhs, Deputy Clerk) |
| Filing 11 (FILED IN ERROR) AFFIDAVIT of Service for Summons & Complaint served on Halle Gray, Esq on January 26,2022, filed by Robert E Peterson, Sr. (Sanders, Danielle) Modified on 2/2/2022 (bmhs, Deputy Clerk). |
| Filing 10 Summons Issued 21 days as to Creekstone Landscape Excavating, LLC and Steven Lee Shoemaker, Jr.(bmhs, Deputy Clerk) |
| Filing 9 STATUS REPORT Plaintiff's Status Report re Service by Robert E Peterson, Sr. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Complaint, #2 Exhibit Writs, #3 Exhibit Notice of Removal)(Sanders, Danielle) |
| Filing 8 NOTICE by Robert E Peterson, Sr. (Attachments: #1 Summons, #2 Summons)(Sanders, Danielle) |
Filing 7
ORDER directing plaintiff to file a status report advising this Court regarding the status of service upon Defendants. Signed by Chief Judge James K. Bredar on 12/21/2021. (kk5s, Deputy Clerk)
|
| Filing 6 Local Rule 103.5 Certification of Filing of State Court Papers (Attachments: #1 Exhibit, #2 Exhibit, #3 Exhibit)(Finamore, Paul) |
| Filing 5 RESPONSE re #4 Notice of Standing Order 2021-13 Concerning Removal Actions Defendants Statement in Response to the Court's Standing Order 2021-13 Concerning Removal filed by Creekstone Landscape Excavating, LLC, Steven Lee Shoemaker, Jr.(Finamore, Paul) |
| Filing 4 Clerk's Notice of Standing Order concerning removal actions filed in this Court, which can be downloaded #here. (bmhs, Deputy Clerk) |
| The case of Peterson v Shoemaker, et al, has been opened in the District of Maryland. The case number is JKB-21-3131. PLEASE NOTE: You must pay the case filing fee within 48 hours. To pay online, select the event Civil Case Filing Fee which is found under Civil Events --> Other Filings --> Other Documents. Otherwise, forward a check made payable to Clerk, U.S. District Court and note the assigned case number on the check or cover letter. (bmhs, Deputy Clerk) |
| CIVIL CASE FILING FEE: $ 402, receipt number 0416-9648390(Finamore, Paul) |
| Filing 3 COMPLAINT against Creekstone Landscape Excavating, LLC, Steven Lee Shoemaker, Jr filed by Robert E Peterson, Sr.(bmhs, Deputy Clerk) |
| THE ABOVE DOCUMENTS (3) ARE COPIES OF ORIGINAL PAPERS FILED IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF MARYLAND FOR WASHINGTON COUNTY. (bmhs, Deputy Clerk) |
| Filing 2 Local Rule 103.3 Disclosure Statement by Creekstone Landscape Excavating, LLC, Steven Lee Shoemaker (Finamore, Paul) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from Circuit Court for Washington County, MD, case number C-21-CV-21-000381., filed by Creekstone Landscape Excavating, LLC, Steven Lee Shoemaker. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Exhibit State Court Complaint)(Finamore, Paul) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Maryland District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
