Boston v. Smith & Nephew Inc
| Lucille Boston, on behalf of the Estate of Boston R Lang, Lucille Boston, on behalf of the Estate of Lang R. Boston and Lucille Boston |
| Smith & Nephew Inc |
| 1:2021cv03298 |
| December 28, 2021 |
| US District Court for the District of Maryland |
| Catherine C Blake |
| Personal Inj. Prod. Liability |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1407 MDL: Products Liability |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on February 15, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 9 -SEALED-RESPONSE in Opposition re (3304 in 1:17-md-02775-CCB) MOTION for Summary Judgment As to All Claims of Plaintiffs with Implant Dates Prior to October 2009 Plaintiffs' Memorandum in Response to Smith & Nephew's Motion for Summary Judgement as to All Claims of Plaintiffs With Implant Dates Prior to October 2009 filed by In re: Smith & Nephew Birmingham Hip Resurfacing (BHR) Hip Implant Products Liability Litigation. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit List, #2 Exhibit 1, #3 Exhibit 2, #4 Exhibit 3, #5 Exhibit 4, #6 Exhibit 5, #7 Exhibit 6, #8 Exhibit 7, #9 Exhibit 8, #10 Exhibit 9, #11 Exhibit 10, #12 Exhibit 11, #13 Exhibit 12, #14 Exhibit 13, #15 Exhibit 14, #16 Exhibit 15, #17 Exhibit 16, #18 Exhibit 17, #19 Exhibit 18, #20 Exhibit 19, #21 Exhibit 20, #22 Exhibit 21)Associated Cases: 1:17-md-02775-CCB et al.(Jenner, Robert) |
| Filing 8 NOTICE by Smith & Nephew, Inc. of Filing Updated Listings of Pending BHR and THA Track Cases (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A (BHR Track Cases), #2 Exhibit B (THA Track Cases))Associated Cases: 1:17-md-02775-CCB et al.(Wozniak, Jana) |
Filing 7
ORDER confirming the dates set during the conference call. Signed by Judge Catherine C. Blake on 2/10/2022. Associated Cases: 1:17-md-02775-CCB et al.(bmhs, Deputy Clerk)
|
| Filing 6 NOTICE by Smith & Nephew, Inc. of Filing Updated Listings of Pending BHR and THA Track Cases (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A (BHR Track Cases), #2 Exhibit B (THA Track Cases))Associated Cases: 1:17-md-02775-CCB et al.(Zidlicky, Paul) |
| Filing 5 Memorandum re (561 in 1:17-cv-01077-CCB) MOTION for Other Relief Plaintiffs' Revised Motion to Activate Case-Specific Discovery For Remand And Trial Plaintiffs' Supplemental Memorandum in Support of Plaintiffs' Motion to Activate Case-Specific Discovery For Remand and Trial filed by In re: Smith & Nephew Birmingham Hip Resurfacing (BHR) Hip Implant Products Liability Litigation. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1, #2 Exhibit 2)Associated Cases: 1:17-md-02775-CCB et al.(Jenner, Robert) |
| Filing 4 NOTICE by Smith & Nephew, Inc. of Filing Updated Listings of Pending BHR and THA Track Cases (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A (BHR Track Cases), #2 Exhibit B (THA Track Cases))Associated Cases: 1:17-md-02775-CCB et al.(Wozniak, Jana) |
|
Filing 3
ORDER confirming the results of yesterday's conference call. Signed by Judge Catherine C. Blake on 1/6/2022. Associated Cases: 1:17-md-02775-CCB et al.(bmhs, Deputy Clerk)
|
| Filing 2 NOTICE by Smith & Nephew, Inc. of Filing Updated Listings of BHR and THA Track Cases (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A (BHR Track Cases), #2 Exhibit B (THA Track Cases))Associated Cases: 1:17-md-02775-CCB et al.(Wozniak, Jana) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT BHR Track against Smith & Nephew Inc ( Filing fee $ 402 receipt number 0416-9674655.), filed by Lucille Boston, on behalf of the Estate of Lang R. Boston. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(Davis, Alex) |
| Case Assigned to Judge Catherine C. Blake. (ko, Deputy Clerk) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Maryland District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
