Olson et al v. Smith and Nephew, Inc.
Plaintiff: Tracy Olson and Irene Michelle Olson
Defendant: Smith and Nephew, Inc.
Case Number: 1:2022cv00081
Filed: January 11, 2022
Court: US District Court for the District of Maryland
Presiding Judge: Catherine C Blake
Nature of Suit: Personal Inj. Prod. Liability
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Property Damage/Product Liability
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on March 10, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
March 10, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 12 ORDER confirming the results of the various calendaring issues discussed during the conference call. Signed by Judge Catherine C. Blake on 3/10/2022. Associated Cases: 1:17-md-02775-CCB et al.(bmhs, Deputy Clerk)
March 4, 2022 Filing 11 REPLY to Response to Motion re (3304 in 1:17-md-02775-CCB) MOTION for Summary Judgment As to All Claims of Plaintiffs with Implant Dates Prior to October 2009 filed by Smith & Nephew, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Index of Exhibits, #2 Exhibit A, #3 Exhibit B, #4 Exhibit C, #5 Exhibit D, #6 Exhibit E, #7 Exhibit F, #8 Exhibit G)Associated Cases: 1:17-md-02775-CCB et al.(Zidlicky, Paul)
March 1, 2022 Filing 10 NOTICE by Smith & Nephew, Inc. of Filing Updated Listings of Pending BHR and THA Track Cases (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A (BHR Track Cases), #2 Exhibit B (THA Track Cases))Associated Cases: 1:17-md-02775-CCB et al.(Wozniak, Jana)
February 28, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 9 ORDER granting in part and denying in part (2762) Smith & Nephew's Motion for Summary Judgment for all male plaintiffs implanted with BHR devices with large femoral head sizes in case 1:17-md-02775-CCB. Signed by Judge Catherine C. Blake on 2/28/2022. Associated Cases: 1:17-md-02775-CCB et al.(bmhs, Deputy Clerk)
February 28, 2022 Filing 8 MEMORANDUM. Signed by Judge Catherine C. Blake on 2/28/2022. Associated Cases: 1:17-md-02775-CCB et al.(bmhs, Deputy Clerk)
February 15, 2022 Filing 7 -SEALED-RESPONSE in Opposition re (3304 in 1:17-md-02775-CCB) MOTION for Summary Judgment As to All Claims of Plaintiffs with Implant Dates Prior to October 2009 Plaintiffs' Memorandum in Response to Smith & Nephew's Motion for Summary Judgement as to All Claims of Plaintiffs With Implant Dates Prior to October 2009 filed by In re: Smith & Nephew Birmingham Hip Resurfacing (BHR) Hip Implant Products Liability Litigation. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit List, #2 Exhibit 1, #3 Exhibit 2, #4 Exhibit 3, #5 Exhibit 4, #6 Exhibit 5, #7 Exhibit 6, #8 Exhibit 7, #9 Exhibit 8, #10 Exhibit 9, #11 Exhibit 10, #12 Exhibit 11, #13 Exhibit 12, #14 Exhibit 13, #15 Exhibit 14, #16 Exhibit 15, #17 Exhibit 16, #18 Exhibit 17, #19 Exhibit 18, #20 Exhibit 19, #21 Exhibit 20, #22 Exhibit 21)Associated Cases: 1:17-md-02775-CCB et al.(Jenner, Robert)
February 14, 2022 Filing 6 NOTICE by Smith & Nephew, Inc. of Filing Updated Listings of Pending BHR and THA Track Cases (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A (BHR Track Cases), #2 Exhibit B (THA Track Cases))Associated Cases: 1:17-md-02775-CCB et al.(Wozniak, Jana)
February 10, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 5 ORDER confirming the dates set during the conference call. Signed by Judge Catherine C. Blake on 2/10/2022. Associated Cases: 1:17-md-02775-CCB et al.(bmhs, Deputy Clerk)
February 1, 2022 Filing 4 NOTICE by Smith & Nephew, Inc. of Filing Updated Listings of Pending BHR and THA Track Cases (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A (BHR Track Cases), #2 Exhibit B (THA Track Cases))Associated Cases: 1:17-md-02775-CCB et al.(Zidlicky, Paul)
January 25, 2022 Filing 3 Memorandum re (561 in 1:17-cv-01077-CCB) MOTION for Other Relief Plaintiffs' Revised Motion to Activate Case-Specific Discovery For Remand And Trial Plaintiffs' Supplemental Memorandum in Support of Plaintiffs' Motion to Activate Case-Specific Discovery For Remand and Trial filed by In re: Smith & Nephew Birmingham Hip Resurfacing (BHR) Hip Implant Products Liability Litigation. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1, #2 Exhibit 2)Associated Cases: 1:17-md-02775-CCB et al.(Jenner, Robert)
January 18, 2022 Filing 2 NOTICE by Smith & Nephew, Inc. of Filing Updated Listings of Pending BHR and THA Track Cases (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A (BHR Track Cases), #2 Exhibit B (THA Track Cases))Associated Cases: 1:17-md-02775-CCB et al.(Wozniak, Jana)
January 12, 2022 Case Assigned to Judge Catherine C. Blake. (ko, Deputy Clerk)
January 11, 2022 Filing 1 COMPLAINT Short-Form Complaint against Smith and Nephew, Inc. ( Filing fee $ 402 receipt number 0416-9694441.), filed by Tracy Olson, Irene Michelle Olson. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(Williams, Jessica)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Maryland District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Olson et al v. Smith and Nephew, Inc.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Tracy Olson
Represented By: Jessica S Williams
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Irene Michelle Olson
Represented By: Jessica S Williams
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Smith and Nephew, Inc.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?