Dragenis v. Holland et al
Petitioner: Osner Dragenis
Respondent: Fulton Holland, Janean Ohin, Alejandro Mayorkas and Merrick Garland
Case Number: 1:2022cv00201
Filed: January 27, 2022
Court: US District Court for the District of Maryland
Presiding Judge: Paul W Grimm
Nature of Suit: Habeas Corpus - Alien Detainee
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 2241 Habeas Corpus: INS
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on March 1, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
March 1, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 13 MARGINAL ORDER approving #12 STIPULATION of Dismissal; directing the Clerk to close this case. Signed by Judge Paul W. Grimm on 3/1/2022. (mg3s, Deputy Clerk)
March 1, 2022 Filing 12 STIPULATION of Dismissal by Osner Dragenis(Rose, Ian)
February 8, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 11 ORDER granting #10 Joint MOTION to Stay. Signed by Judge Paul W. Grimm on 2/8/2022. (mg3s, Deputy Clerk)
February 3, 2022 Filing 10 Joint MOTION to Stay by Merrick Garland, Alejandro Mayorkas, Janean Ohin (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order)(Marzullo, Kelly)
February 2, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 9 PAPERLESS ORDER memorializing today's telephone conference. The Government has agreed to keep Petitioner in this Court's jurisdiction at the current detention facility until March 12, 2022. The parties have agreed to stay this case pending a bond hearing, having agreed that Petitioner is not subject to mandatory detention. The Government will promptly file a motion to stay with a proposed order. The parties will confer in an effort to agree on a date by which Petitioner's bond hearing will be held. If there is no agreement, Petitioner will file a letter motion on or before February 4, 2022 seeking the Court's ruling to provide a deadline for the bond hearing to be held; a response will be due on or before February 14, 2022; and a reply will be due on or before February 21, 2022. The letter motion, response, and reply shall each be no more than 3 pages single-spaced, excluding exhibits, Times New Roman 12-point font. If exhibits are attached, the parties are directed to highlight the key language so the Court can readily determine the relevant information in the exhibit. Signed by Judge Paul W. Grimm on 2/2/2022. (imws, Chambers)
February 1, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 8 LETTER ORDER scheduling a telephone conference call on February 2, 2022 at 3:00 p.m. Signed by Judge Paul W. Grimm on 2/1/2022. (mg3s, Deputy Clerk)
January 31, 2022 Filing 7 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE by Osner Dragenis re Letter Order to Show Cause (Rose, Ian)
January 31, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 6 LETTER ORDER granting #5 Motion for Order to Show Cause. Signed by Judge Paul W. Grimm on 1/31/2022. (mg3s, Deputy Clerk)
January 31, 2022 Filing 5 MOTION for Order to Show Cause by Osner Dragenis (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order to Show Cause)(Rose, Ian)
January 31, 2022 Filing 4 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE by Osner Dragenis re Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, Certified Mail and Delivery Confirmation)(Rose, Ian)
January 31, 2022 Filing 3 NOTICE of Appearance by Ian Austin Rose on behalf of Osner Dragenis (Rose, Ian)
January 31, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 2 CASE MANAGEMENT ORDER. Signed by Judge Paul W. Grimm on 1/31/2022. (mg3s, Deputy Clerk)
January 27, 2022 Filing 1 PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus ( Filing fee $ 5 receipt number 0416-9721621.), filed by Osner Dragenis. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Civil Cover Sheet Supplement to Civil Cover Sheet, #3 Exhibit Ex. A, Notice to Appear, #4 Exhibit Ex. B, Board of Immigration Appeals Brief, #5 Exhibit Ex. C, Release Request, #6 Exhibit Ex. D, Psychological Evaluation, #7 Exhibit Ex. E, Letter of Familial Support, #8 Exhibit Ex. F, Post-Release Plan, #9 Text of Proposed Order Proposed Order For Release, #10 Text of Proposed Order Proposed Order for Bond)(Rose, Ian)
January 27, 2022 Case Assigned to Judge Paul W. Grimm. (ko, Deputy Clerk)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Maryland District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Dragenis v. Holland et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: Osner Dragenis
Represented By: Ian Austin Rose
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: Fulton Holland
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: Janean Ohin
Represented By: Kelly M Marzullo
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: Alejandro Mayorkas
Represented By: Kelly M Marzullo
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: Merrick Garland
Represented By: Kelly M Marzullo
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?