Degross v. Office Depot Office Max
Plaintiff: Kim A. Degross
Defendant: Office Depot Office Max
Case Number: 1:2022cv00291
Filed: February 3, 2022
Court: US District Court for the District of Maryland
Presiding Judge: James K Bredar
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights: Jobs
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1441
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on March 10, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
March 9, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 10 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER granting #6 Motion to Dismiss; and dismissing the Complaint. Signed by Chief Judge James K. Bredar on 3/9/2022. (bmhs, Deputy Clerk)
February 17, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 9 RESPONSE re #5 Notice of Standing Order 2021-13 Concerning Removal Actions filed by Office Depot Office Max.(Henninger, Sarah)
February 17, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 8 QC NOTICE: #7 Response filed by Office Depot Office Max (forwarded by the District Court of Maryland) on 2/17/2022 was deficient. See attachment for details. (dass, Deputy Clerk)
February 17, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 7 RESPONSE forwarded by the District Court of Maryland re #5 Notice of Standing Order 2021-13 Concerning Removal Actions filed by Office Depot Office Max. (Attachments: #1 Envelope)(dass, Deputy Clerk)
February 10, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 6 MOTION to Dismiss by Office Depot Office Max (Attachments: #1 Memorandum in Support, #2 Exhibit A, #3 Exhibit B, #4 Exhibit C, #5 Text of Proposed Order)(Henninger, Sarah)
February 3, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 5 Clerk's Notice of Standing Order concerning removal actions filed in this Court, which can be downloaded #here. (bmhs, Deputy Clerk)
February 3, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 4 Correspondence to Chidi Onukwugha re: Removal notification.(c/m and c/em 2/3/22 bmhs, Deputy Clerk)
February 3, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 3 COMPLAINT against Office Depot Office Max filed by Kim A. Degross.(bmhs, Deputy Clerk)
February 3, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 2 Local Rule 103.3 Disclosure Statement by Office Depot Office Max identifying Corporate Parent ODP Investment, LLC, Other Affiliate BlackRock, Inc., Other Affiliate The Vanguard Group, Inc., Other Affiliate ODP Corporation for Office Depot Office Max.(Henninger, Sarah)
February 3, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from Baltimore City Circuit Court, case number 24-C-21-005557. ( Filing fee $ 402 receipt number 0416-9733970), filed by Office Depot Office Max. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Notice to Plaintiff, #3 Notice of Filing, #4 SC- Cover Sheet, #5 SC - Complaint)(Henninger, Sarah)
February 3, 2022 Opinion or Order THE ABOVE DOCUMENTS (3) ARE COPIES OF ORIGINAL PAPERS FILED IN THE CIRCUIT COURT FOR BALTIMORE CITY. (bmhs, Deputy Clerk)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Maryland District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Degross v. Office Depot Office Max
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Kim A. Degross
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Office Depot Office Max
Represented By: Sarah E Henninger
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?