BUTLER v. WP MD PROPCO, I, LLC et al
TRAVON BUTLER |
WP MD PROPCO, I, LLC, THE BAINBRIDGE COMPANIES and WP MD Propco I, LLC |
1:2022cv00300 |
February 4, 2022 |
US District Court for the District of Maryland |
Catherine C Blake |
Rent Lease & Ejectment |
28 U.S.C. § 1441 |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on June 22, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 15 STIPULATED CONFIDENTIALITY ORDER, Motions terminated: #14 MOTION filed by The Bainbridge Companies, WP MD Propco I, LLC.. Signed by Judge Catherine C. Blake on 4/4/2022. (bas, Deputy Clerk) |
Filing 14 MOTION by The Bainbridge Companies, WP MD Propco I, LLC (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Exhibit A to Consent Motion for Entry of Stipulated Order Regarding Confidentiality of Discovery Material)(Phillips, Scott) |
Filing 13 SCHEDULING ORDER: Status Report due by 6/23/2022. Signed by Judge Catherine C. Blake on 2/25/2022. (bas, Deputy Clerk) |
Telephone Conference re: Scheduling held on 2/25/2022 before Judge Catherine C. Blake. (kams, Deputy Clerk) |
Filing 12 MISCELLANEOUS Correspondence to counsel advising of a conference call to discuss the attached proposed scheduling order. Counsel are requested to confirm with Chambers their participation. (sj2s, Chambers) (bas, Deputy Clerk). |
Filing 11 Clerk's Notice of Standing Order concerning removal actions filed in this Court, which can be downloaded #here. (bas, Deputy Clerk) |
Filing 10 STATEMENT CONCERNING REMOVAL by The Bainbridge Companies, WP MD Propco I, LLC (bas, Deputy Clerk) |
Filing 9 CERTIFICATE OF FILING OF COPY NOTICE OF REMOVAL IN STATE COURT by The Bainbridge Companies, WP MD Propco I, LLC (bas, Deputy Clerk) |
Filing 8 Summons Issued 30 days as to The Bainbridge Companies.(bas, Deputy Clerk) |
Filing 7 Jury Trial Demand by Travon Butler(bas, Deputy Clerk) |
Filing 6 COMPLAINT against The Bainbridge Companies, WP MD Propco I, LLC, filed by Travon Butler. (Attachments: #1 Case Information Report)(bas, Deputy Clerk) |
THE ABOVE DOCUMENTS (6-8) ARE COPIES OF ORIGINAL PAPERS FILED IN THE CIRCUIT COURT FOR BALTIMORE CITY. (bas, Deputy Clerk) |
Filing 5 NOTICE of Appearance by Ralph L Arnsdorf on behalf of THE BAINBRIDGE COMPANIES, WP MD PROPCO, I, LLC (Arnsdorf, Ralph) |
Filing 4 Local Rule 103.3 Disclosure Statement by THE BAINBRIDGE COMPANIES, WP MD PROPCO, I, LLC identifying Other Affiliate WP JV Holdings 2021, LLC for WP MD PROPCO, I, LLC; Other Affiliate Bainbridge Holdings I, LLC, Other Affiliate RAS Manager, LLC, Other Affiliate Bainbridge Mid-Atlantic Management, LLC for THE BAINBRIDGE COMPANIES.(Phillips, Scott) |
Filing 3 ANSWER to Complaint that was filed in state court by THE BAINBRIDGE COMPANIES, WP MD PROPCO, I, LLC.(Phillips, Scott) |
Filing 2 NOTICE of Appearance by Scott Hamilton Phillips on behalf of THE BAINBRIDGE COMPANIES, WP MD PROPCO, I, LLC (Phillips, Scott) |
Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from Circuit Court for Baltimore City, case number 24-C-21-005383., filed by THE BAINBRIDGE COMPANIES, WP MD PROPCO, I, LLC. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Attachment Certificate of Filing Notice of Removal, #3 Attachment Statement Concerning Removal, #4 Exhibit 1 - Complaint, #5 Exhibit 2 - Writ of Summons, #6 Exhibit 3 - Civil Non-Domestic Case Information Report, #7 Exhibit 4 - Prayer for Jury Trial, #8 Exhibit 5 - Notice regarding Attorneys Fees)(Phillips, Scott) |
Filing fee: $ 402.00, receipt number 0416-9736234 (bas, Deputy Clerk) |
Case Assigned to Judge Catherine C. Blake. (ko, Deputy Clerk) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Maryland District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.