Asbestos Workers Local 24 Medical Fund et al v. Rabco Insulation, Inc.
Asbestos Workers Local 24 Medical Fund, Kevin Orchard, Scott Grant, Brian S. Cavey, Robert S. McCourt, Jonathan Potter, Robert Ciancaglini, Asbestos Workers Local 24 Pension Fund, Mike Moneymaker, Forrest Warman, Steve Pumphrey, Asbestos Workers Local 24 Apprenticeship Fund, Wilfredo Mata, Jeff Ignatowski, Ken Graves and Asbestos Workers Local 24 Advancement & Advocacy Fund |
Rabco Insulation, Inc. |
1:2022cv00313 |
February 4, 2022 |
US District Court for the District of Maryland |
Stephanie A Gallagher |
Labor: E.R.I.S.A. |
29 U.S.C. ยง 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on February 7, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 2 Summons Issued 21 days as to Rabco Insulation, Inc. (ols, Deputy Clerk) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Rabco Insulation, Inc. ( Filing fee $ 402 receipt number 0416-9737512.), filed by Steve Pumphrey, Robert Ciancaglini, Kevin Orchard, Asbestos Workers Local 24 Medical Fund, Wilfredo Mata, Asbestos Workers Local 24 Advancement & Advocacy Fund, Jonathan Potter, Scott Grant, Mike Moneymaker, Asbestos Workers Local 24 Apprenticeship Fund, Ken Graves, Jeff Ignatowski, Asbestos Workers Local 24 Pension Fund, Brian S. Cavey, Forrest Warman, Robert S. McCourt. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Summons, #3 Exhibit A, #4 Exhibit B, #5 Exhibit C, #6 Exhibit D, #7 Exhibit E, #8 Exhibit F, #9 Exhibit G)(Lin, Andrew) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Maryland District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.