Howell v. Hogan et al
| Darlene E. Howell and Darlene Eubank Howell |
| Lawrence Joseph Hogan, Jr. and Tiffany P. Robinson |
| 1:2022cv00408 |
| February 17, 2022 |
| US District Court for the District of Maryland |
| Deborah L. Boardman |
| Civil Rights: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on December 19, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 6
Consent MOTION for Extension of Time by Lawrence Joseph Hogan, Jr, Tiffany P. Robinson (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Exhibit A)(Sokolow, Nicholas)
|
|
Filing 5
SUMMONS Returned Executed by Darlene Eubank Howell. Lawrence Joseph Hogan, Jr served on 3/29/2022, answer due 4/19/2022; Tiffany P. Robinson served on 3/29/2022, answer due 4/19/2022.(kk5s, Deputy Clerk)
|
|
Filing 4
Summons Issued 21 days as to Lawrence Joseph Hogan, Jr, Tiffany P. Robinson. (c/m 3/10/2022)(kk5s, Deputy Clerk)
|
|
Filing 3
ORDER directing Clerk to issue summons and return to plaintiff. Signed by Judge Deborah L. Boardman on 3/10/2022. (c/m 3/10/2022)(kk5s, Deputy Clerk)
|
|
Filing 2
Correspondence from Darlene Eubank Howell re: request for Order directing issuance of summonses (kk5s, Deputy Clerk)
|
|
Filing 1
COMPLAINT against Lawrence Joseph Hogan, Jr, Tiffany P. Robinson ( Filing fee $ 402 receipt number 14637131581.), filed by Darlene E. Howell. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Summons)(jb5s, Deputy Clerk)
|
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Maryland District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
