Al Ali et al v. Jaddou
| Rawi Shams Aldeen Al Ali, Tarek Antar Birro and Rawia Shams Aldeen Al Ali |
| Director Ur Mendoza Jaddou and Ur Mendoza Jaddou |
| 1:2022cv00485 |
| February 28, 2022 |
| US District Court for the District of Maryland |
| George Levi Russell |
| Other Statutes: Administrative Procedures Act/Review or Appeal of Agency Decision |
| 05 U.S.C. ยง 706 Judicial Review of Agency Action |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on March 30, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 4
MARGINAL ORDER approving #3 Notice of Voluntary Dismissal filed by Tarek Antar Birro, Rawia Shams Aldeen Al Ali; closing case. Signed by Judge George Levi Russell, III on 3/30/2022. (dass, Deputy Clerk)
|
| Filing 3 NOTICE of Voluntary Dismissal by Rawia Shams Aldeen Al Ali, Tarek Antar Birro (Gandhi, Rina) |
| Filing 2 Summons Issued 60 days as to Ur Mendoza Jaddou, U.S. Attorney and U.S. Attorney General. (dass, Deputy Clerk) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against All Defendants ( Filing fee $ 402 receipt number AMDDC-9786952.), filed by Tarek Antar Birro, Rawia Shams Aldeen Al Ali. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1, I-730 Receipt Notice, #2 Exhibit 2, I-730 Transfer Notice, #3 Exhibit 3, Second I-730 Transfer Notice, #4 Exhibit 4, Letter to USCIS, #5 Exhibit 5, USPS Tracking Information, #6 Exhibit 6, USCIS Online Case Status Information System, #7 Civil Cover Sheet, #8 Summons)(Gandhi, Rina) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Maryland District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
