Martinez v. Amazon.com Services LLC
| Estefany Martinez |
| Amazon.com Services LLC |
| 1:2022cv00502 |
| March 2, 2022 |
| US District Court for the District of Maryland |
| Lydia Kay Griggsby |
| Labor: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 Notice of Removal |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on March 14, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 9 RESPONSE re #6 Notice of Standing Order 2021-13 Concerning Removal Actions filed by Amazon.com Services LLC.(Waxman, Joshua) |
Filing 8
ORDER granting #4 Parties' Motion to Stay; directing parties to file a joint status report no more than 14 days after the issuance of a decision in Amaya and Rojas; directing defendant to file a responsive pleading no more than 30 days after the stay is lifted; and directing plaintiff to file any motion to remand no more than 30 days after the stay is lifted. Signed by Judge Lydia Kay Griggsby on 3/11/2022. (bmhs, Deputy Clerk)
|
|
Filing 7
CASE MANAGEMENT ORDER. Signed by Judge Lydia Kay Griggsby on 3/7/2022. (bmhs, Deputy Clerk)
|
| Filing 6 Clerk's Notice of Standing Order concerning removal actions filed in this Court, which can be downloaded #here. (kos, Deputy Clerk) |
| Filing 5 COMPLAINT against Amazon.com Services LLC, filed by Estefany Martinez. (Attachments: #1 Case Information Report)(kos, Deputy Clerk) |
| THE ABOVE DOCUMENTS (5) ARE COPIES OF ORIGINAL PAPERS FILED IN THE CIRCUIT COURT FOR BALTIMORE CITY. (kos, Deputy Clerk) |
| Filing 4 Joint MOTION to Stay and Stipulation by Amazon.com Services LLC (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order)(Waxman, Joshua) |
| Filing 3 Supplemental to #1 Notice of Removal,, filed by Amazon.com Services LLC (Waxman, Joshua) |
| Filing 2 Local Rule 103.3 Disclosure Statement by Amazon.com Services LLC identifying Corporate Parent Amazon.Com, Inc. for Amazon.com Services LLC.(Waxman, Joshua) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from Circuit Court of Baltimore City, Maryland, case number 24-C-21-5414. ( Filing fee $ 402 receipt number AMDDC-9791895), filed by Amazon.com Services LLC. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Exhibit A1 -- Complaint, #3 Exhibit A2 -- Writ of Summons, #4 Exhibit A3 -- Affidavit of Service, #5 Exhibit A4 -- Civil Non-Domestic Case Information Report, #6 Exhibit B -- Email Regarding Service of Complaint and Summons, #7 Exhibit C -- Declaration of Zane Brown, #8 Exhibit D -- Declaration of Kimberley Richardson)(Waxman, Joshua) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Maryland District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Martinez v. Amazon.com Services LLC | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Estefany Martinez | |
| Represented By: | Brian Joseph Markovitz |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Amazon.com Services LLC | |
| Represented By: | Joshua B Waxman |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
