Rouzer v. Autovest, LLC
| Shantel Rouzer |
| Autovest, LLC |
| 1:2022cv00537 |
| March 7, 2022 |
| US District Court for the District of Maryland |
| Ellen L Hollander |
| Julie Rebecca Rubin |
| Consumer Credit |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 Removal - Fair Debt Collection Practices Act |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on March 15, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Case Reassigned to Judge Julie Rebecca Rubin. District Judge Ellen Lipton Hollander no longer assigned to the case. (chs, Deputy Clerk)
|
|
Filing 10
PAPERLESS ORDER. A telephone conference to discuss the draft Scheduling Order has been scheduled for May 9, 2022, at 4:30 p.m. Counsel for plaintiff is to initiate the call to defense counsel and then to Chambers at 410-962-0742. Signed by District Judge Ellen Lipton Hollander on 4/28/2022. (kws, Chambers)
|
|
Filing 9
MEMORANDUM to Counsel re Telephone Conference on Draft Scheduling Order. Signed by District Judge Ellen Lipton Hollander on 4/8/2022. (kk5s, Deputy Clerk)
|
|
Filing 8
ANSWER to #5 Complaint by Autovest, LLC.(Burnette, Lauren)
|
|
Filing 7
RESPONSE re #6 Notice of Standing Order 2021-13 Concerning Removal Actions filed by Autovest, LLC.(Burnette, Lauren)
|
|
Filing 6
Clerk's Notice of Standing Order concerning removal actions filed in this Court, which can be downloaded #here. (kk5s, Deputy Clerk)
|
|
Filing 4
NOTICE by Autovest, LLC re #1 Notice of Removal, (Attachments: #1 State Court SUMMONS)(Burnette, Lauren)
|
|
Filing 5
State Court COMPLAINT against Autovest, LLC, filed by Shantel Rouzer. (Attachments: #1 Civil Case Information Report)(kk5s, Deputy Clerk)
|
|
THE ABOVE DOCUMENTS (5) ARE COPIES OF ORIGINAL PAPERS FILED IN THE CIRCUIT COURT FOR ANNE ARUNDEL COUNTY. (kk5s, Deputy Clerk)
|
|
Filing 3
QC NOTICE: #1 Notice of Removal, filed by Autovest, LLC was filed incorrectly. **State Court documents should be scanned and attached individually, as well as being labeled with the title of each document. Please file state court documents using the event "Notice-other" and link to #1 Notice of Removal. The state court complaint can be the main document. (kk5s, Deputy Clerk)
|
|
Filing 2
Local Rule 103.3 Disclosure Statement by Autovest, LLC (Burnette, Lauren)
|
|
Filing 1
NOTICE OF REMOVAL from Circuit Court, Anne Arundel County, case number C-02-CV-22-000131. ( Filing fee $ 402 receipt number AMDDC-9800097), filed by Autovest, LLC. (Attachments: #1 Summons and Complaint, #2 Civil Cover Sheet)(Burnette, Lauren)
|
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Maryland District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Rouzer v. Autovest, LLC | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Shantel Rouzer | |
| Represented By: | Emanwel Josef Turnbull |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Autovest, LLC | |
| Represented By: | Lauren M Burnette |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
