Bradley v Baltimore City Police Department et al
| William Bradley |
| Baltimore City Police Department, Frank Mundy, Kathy Jackson, Monique Brown and Lisa Robinson |
| 1:2022cv00641 |
| March 15, 2022 |
| US District Court for the District of Maryland |
| A David Copperthite |
| Civil Rights: Other |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Civil Rights Act - Civil Action for Deprivation of Rights |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on September 28, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 5 QC NOTICE: #1 Complaint filed by William Bradley was filed incorrectly. **The following attachments or exhibits are missing - Summons. To correct this problem, file Summons using the event Notice (Other) and link Summons to #1 Complaint. (bmhs, Deputy Clerk) |
| Filing 4 Supplemental to #1 Complaint filed by William Bradley Civil Cover Sheet (Bates, Ivan) |
| Filing 3 UNREDACTED DOCUMENT (Bates, Ivan) |
| Filing 2 QC NOTICE: #1 Complaint filed by William Bradley was filed incorrectly. **The following attachments or exhibits are missing - Civil Cover Sheet and Summons. To correct this problem, file Civil Cover Sheet and Summons using the event Notice (Other) and link Civil Cover Sheet and Summons to #1 Complaint. (bmhs, Deputy Clerk) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against All Defendants ( Filing fee $ 402 receipt number AMDDC-9820795.), filed by William Bradley.(Bates, Ivan) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Maryland District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
