Marshall et al v. Smith & Nephew, Inc.
Plaintiff: Andrew Marshall and Tamra Marshall
Defendant: Smith & Nephew, Inc.
Case Number: 1:2022cv00643
Filed: March 15, 2022
Court: US District Court for the District of Maryland
Presiding Judge: Catherine C Blake
Nature of Suit: Personal Injury: Health Care/Pharmaceutical Personal Injury Product Liability
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on May 9, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
May 9, 2022 Filing 14 NOTICE by Smith & Nephew, Inc. of Filing Updated Listings of Pending BHR and THA Track Cases (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A (BHR Track Cases), #2 Exhibit B (THA Track Cases))Associated Cases: 1:17-md-02775-CCB et al.(Wozniak, Jana)
May 4, 2022 Filing 13 -SEALED - NOTICE of Filing Under Seal Exhibit 1 to Statement of Monthly Accounting by In re: Smith & Nephew Birmingham Hip Resurfacing (BHR) Hip Implant Products Liability Litigation re (3632 in 1:17-md-02775-CCB) Notice (Other) Associated Cases: 1:17-md-02775-CCB et al.(Jenner, Robert)
May 4, 2022 Filing 12 NOTICE by In re: Smith & Nephew Birmingham Hip Resurfacing (BHR) Hip Implant Products Liability Litigation Statement of Monthly Accounting (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1)Associated Cases: 1:17-md-02775-CCB et al.(Jenner, Robert)
April 27, 2022 Filing 11 NOTICE by In re: Smith & Nephew Birmingham Hip Resurfacing (BHR) Hip Implant Products Liability Litigation of Quarterly Reported Settlements (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1)Associated Cases: 1:17-md-02775-CCB et al.(Jenner, Robert)
April 20, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 10 CASE MANAGEMENT ORDER NO. 23 - Pretrial Scheduling Order for Fall THA Track Trial. Signed by Judge Catherine C. Blake on 4/20/2022. Associated Cases: 1:17-md-02775-CCB et al.(bmhs, Deputy Clerk)
April 18, 2022 Filing 9 NOTICE by Smith & Nephew, Inc. of Filing Updated Listings of Pending BHR and THA Track Cases (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A (BHR Track Cases), #2 Exhibit B (THA Track Cases))Associated Cases: 1:17-md-02775-CCB et al.(Wozniak, Jana)
April 11, 2022 Filing 8 -SEALED - NOTICE of Filing Under Seal Exhibit 1 to Statement of Monthly Accounting by In re: Smith & Nephew Birmingham Hip Resurfacing (BHR) Hip Implant Products Liability Litigation re (3604 in 1:17-md-02775-CCB) Notice (Other) Associated Cases: 1:17-md-02775-CCB et al.(Jenner, Robert)
April 11, 2022 Filing 7 NOTICE by In re: Smith & Nephew Birmingham Hip Resurfacing (BHR) Hip Implant Products Liability Litigation Statement of Monthly Accounting (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1)Associated Cases: 1:17-md-02775-CCB et al.(Jenner, Robert)
April 4, 2022 Filing 6 NOTICE by Smith & Nephew, Inc. of Filing Updated Listings of Pending BHR and THA Track Cases (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A (BHR Track Cases), #2 Exhibit B (THA Track Cases))Associated Cases: 1:17-md-02775-CCB et al.(Wozniak, Jana)
March 28, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 5 ORDER granting (3525) Plaintiffs' Leadership's Motion to Allocate Common Benefit Funds to the "BHR Litigation Account" in 1:17-md-02775-CCB. Signed by Judge Catherine C. Blake on 3/24/2022. Associated Cases: 1:17-md-02775-CCB et al.(bmhs, Deputy Clerk)
March 16, 2022 Filing 4 -SEALED - NOTICE of Filing Under Seal Exhibit 2 to Plaintiffs' Motion To Allocate Common Benefit Funds to the Litigation Account by In re: Smith & Nephew Birmingham Hip Resurfacing (BHR) Hip Implant Products Liability Litigation Associated Cases: 1:17-md-02775-CCB et al.(Jenner, Robert)
March 16, 2022 Filing 3 MOTION for Other Relief Plaintiffs' Motion to Allocate Common Benefit Funds to the BHR Litigation Account by In re: Smith & Nephew Birmingham Hip Resurfacing (BHR) Hip Implant Products Liability Litigation (Attachments: #1 Memorandum in Support, #2 Exhibit 1, #3 Exhibit 2, #4 Text of Proposed Order)Associated Cases: 1:17-md-02775-CCB et al.(Jenner, Robert)
March 16, 2022 Filing 2 DEFICIENCY NOTICE - Pursuant to Case Management Orders, please file the Short Form Complaint regarding this case in 17-md-2775. When prompted if you would like to spread the text, please answer no, as the complaint has already been filed in the individual case. (bmhs, Deputy Clerk)
March 16, 2022 Case Assigned to Judge Catherine C. Blake. (kos, Deputy Clerk)
March 15, 2022 Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Smith & Nephew, Inc. ( Filing fee $ 402 receipt number AMDDC-9821276.), filed by Andrew Marshall, Tamra Marshall. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(Davick, Andrew)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Maryland District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Marshall et al v. Smith & Nephew, Inc.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Andrew Marshall
Represented By: Andrew L Davick
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Tamra Marshall
Represented By: Andrew L Davick
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Smith & Nephew, Inc.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?