Sutton v. Watts et al
Plaintiff: Douglas McArthur Sutton, III
Defendant: Warden Gail Watts, S. Verch and Doctor Zowie Barnes
Case Number: 1:2022cv00673
Filed: March 21, 2022
Court: US District Court for the District of Maryland
Presiding Judge: Peter J Messitte
Nature of Suit: Prisoner: Civil Rights
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on February 16, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
May 17, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 14 ORDER that no later than five (5) days from the date of this Order, Defendant Watts shall file a complete copy of Plaintiff's verified medical records; defendant Watts shall serve a copy of the verified medical records on plaintiff. Signed by Judge Peter J. Messitte on 5/17/2022. (c/m to P 5/17/2022 heps, Deputy Clerk)
May 12, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 13 Local Rule 103.3 Disclosure Statement by S. Verch (Smith, Andrea)
May 12, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 12 Local Rule 103.3 Disclosure Statement by Gail Watts (Smith, Andrea)
May 12, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 11 NOTICE of Appearance by Andrea Danielle Smith on behalf of S. Verch, Gail Watts (Smith, Andrea)
May 12, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 10 RESPONSE TO ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE by S. Verch, Gail Watts by S. Verch, Gail Watts. (Attachments: #1 Affidavit)(Smith, Andrea)
May 5, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 9 ORDER DIRECTING Clerk to electronically send copy of Complaint and withhold service; DIRECTING counsel for defendants to notify court if service is accepted and to answer the Complaint ( re #7 Supplement filed by Douglas McArthur Sutton, III, #1 Complaint filed by Douglas McArthur Sutton, III, #4 Supplement filed by Douglas McArthur Sutton, III, #8 Supplement filed by Douglas McArthur Sutton, III ). Attachments will be emailed to attorneys who have not entered their appearance and were sent this NEF. Attorneys should contact the court if they do not receive the attachments; DIRECTING Defendant Watts to SHOW CAUSE within 7 days as to why injunctive relief should not be granted in favor of Plaintiff. Signed by Judge Peter J. Messitte on 5/5/2022. (c/m and c/em w/docs as directed 5/6/2022 - dg3s, Deputy Clerk)
May 4, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 8 Supplement to #1 Complaint filed by Douglas McArthur Sutton, III (Attachments: #1 Envelope)(dg3s, Deputy Clerk)
May 2, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 7 Supplemental (Update to Current Situation) to #1 Complaint filed by Douglas McArthur Sutton, III (Attachments: #1 Envelope)(dg3s, Deputy Clerk)
April 22, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 6 ORDER DIRECTING Clerk to electronically send copy of Complaint and withhold service; DIRECTING counsel for defendants to notify court if service is accepted and to answer the Complaint ( re #2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis filed by Douglas McArthur Sutton, III, #1 Complaint filed by Douglas McArthur Sutton, III, #4 Supplemental filed by Douglas McArthur Sutton, III ). Attachments will be emailed to attorneys who have not entered their appearance and were sent this NEF. Attorneys should contact the court if they do not receive the attachments; granting #2 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis. Signed by Judge Peter J. Messitte on 4/22/2022. (c/m and c/em as directed 4/22/2022 - dg3s, Deputy Clerk)
April 15, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 5 Prisoner Trust Fund Account Statement (Attachments: #1 Envelope)(mg3s, Deputy Clerk)
April 12, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 4 Supplemental to #1 Complaint filed by Douglas McArthur Sutton, III (Attachments: #1 Envelope)(dg3s, Deputy Clerk)
March 29, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 3 ORDER directing the Finance Officer to file an inmate account summary within 21 days from the date of this order. Signed by Judge Peter J. Messitte on 3/29/2022. (c/m to P 3/29/2022 bs4s, Deputy Clerk)
March 21, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Douglas McArthur Sutton, III (Attachments: #1 Attachment)(jj2s, Deputy Clerk)
March 21, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Zowie Barnes, S. Verch, Gail Watts, filed by Douglas McArthur Sutton, III. (Attachments: #1 Attachment)(jj2s, Deputy Clerk)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Maryland District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Sutton v. Watts et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Douglas McArthur Sutton, III
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Warden Gail Watts
Represented By: Andrea Danielle Smith
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: S. Verch
Represented By: Andrea Danielle Smith
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Doctor Zowie Barnes
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?