Romesburg et al v. Smith & Nephew Inc.
Nathan Romesburg and Kristen Romesburg |
Smith & Nephew Inc. |
1:2022cv00726 |
March 24, 2022 |
US District Court for the District of Maryland |
Catherine C Blake |
Personal Injury: Health Care/Pharmaceutical Personal Injury Product Liability |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Product Liability |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on May 9, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 12 NOTICE by Smith & Nephew, Inc. of Filing Updated Listings of Pending BHR and THA Track Cases (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A (BHR Track Cases), #2 Exhibit B (THA Track Cases))Associated Cases: 1:17-md-02775-CCB et al.(Wozniak, Jana) |
Filing 11 -SEALED - NOTICE of Filing Under Seal Exhibit 1 to Statement of Monthly Accounting by In re: Smith & Nephew Birmingham Hip Resurfacing (BHR) Hip Implant Products Liability Litigation re (3632 in 1:17-md-02775-CCB) Notice (Other) Associated Cases: 1:17-md-02775-CCB et al.(Jenner, Robert) |
Filing 10 NOTICE by In re: Smith & Nephew Birmingham Hip Resurfacing (BHR) Hip Implant Products Liability Litigation Statement of Monthly Accounting (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1)Associated Cases: 1:17-md-02775-CCB et al.(Jenner, Robert) |
Filing 9 NOTICE by In re: Smith & Nephew Birmingham Hip Resurfacing (BHR) Hip Implant Products Liability Litigation of Quarterly Reported Settlements (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1)Associated Cases: 1:17-md-02775-CCB et al.(Jenner, Robert) |
Filing 8 CASE MANAGEMENT ORDER NO. 23 - Pretrial Scheduling Order for Fall THA Track Trial. Signed by Judge Catherine C. Blake on 4/20/2022. Associated Cases: 1:17-md-02775-CCB et al.(bmhs, Deputy Clerk) |
Filing 7 NOTICE by Smith & Nephew, Inc. of Filing Updated Listings of Pending BHR and THA Track Cases (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A (BHR Track Cases), #2 Exhibit B (THA Track Cases))Associated Cases: 1:17-md-02775-CCB et al.(Wozniak, Jana) |
Filing 6 -SEALED - NOTICE of Filing Under Seal Exhibit 1 to Statement of Monthly Accounting by In re: Smith & Nephew Birmingham Hip Resurfacing (BHR) Hip Implant Products Liability Litigation re (3604 in 1:17-md-02775-CCB) Notice (Other) Associated Cases: 1:17-md-02775-CCB et al.(Jenner, Robert) |
Filing 5 NOTICE by In re: Smith & Nephew Birmingham Hip Resurfacing (BHR) Hip Implant Products Liability Litigation Statement of Monthly Accounting (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1)Associated Cases: 1:17-md-02775-CCB et al.(Jenner, Robert) |
Filing 4 WAIVER OF SERVICE Returned Executed by Nathan Romesburg, Kristen Romesburg. Smith & Nephew Inc. waiver sent on 3/31/2022, answer due 5/31/2022.(Schafle, Michael) |
Filing 3 NOTICE by Smith & Nephew, Inc. of Filing Updated Listings of Pending BHR and THA Track Cases (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A (BHR Track Cases), #2 Exhibit B (THA Track Cases))Associated Cases: 1:17-md-02775-CCB et al.(Wozniak, Jana) |
Filing 2 ORDER granting (3525) Plaintiffs' Leadership's Motion to Allocate Common Benefit Funds to the "BHR Litigation Account" in 1:17-md-02775-CCB. Signed by Judge Catherine C. Blake on 3/24/2022. Associated Cases: 1:17-md-02775-CCB et al.(bmhs, Deputy Clerk) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT Short Form Complaint against Smith & Nephew Inc. ( Filing fee $ 402 receipt number AMDDC-9839228.), filed by Nathan Romesburg, Kristen Romesburg. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(Schafle, Michael) |
Case Assigned to Judge Catherine C. Blake. (kos, Deputy Clerk) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Maryland District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.