Neithardt v. Garvey et al
| Michael Ryan Neithardt |
| Jacob Edward Garvey, Jessica Richardson-Garvey, Brandon T Lee and Samantha L. Bayliss |
| 1:2022cv00815 |
| April 5, 2022 |
| US District Court for the District of Maryland |
| Richard D Bennett |
| Civil Rights: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity Action |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on September 1, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 4
Supplement to #1 Complaint, filed by Michael Ryan Neithardt re: physical exhibit USB containing body-worn police camera footage and video from plaintiff's cameras of incident. (dass, Deputy Clerk) (USB physical exhibit filed separatley)
|
|
Filing 3
Summons Issued 21 days as to Samantha L. Bayliss, Jacob Edward Garvey, Brandon T Lee, Jessica Richardson-Garvey. Attachment(s) #1 cover letter, #2 envelope) (dass, Deputy Clerk). (c/m to Plaintiff for service 4/29/22) (USB referenced in cover letter filed as separate entry ECF #3)
|
|
Filing 2
ORDER directing Plaintiff to submit completed summons to clerk to issue and return to plaintiff. Signed by Judge Richard D. Bennett on 4/8/2022. (dass, Deputy Clerk) (c/m w/blank summons forms 4/8/22)
|
|
Filing 1
COMPLAINT against Samantha L. Bayliss, Jacob Edward Garvey, Brandon T Lee, Jessica Richardson-Garvey ( Filing fee $ 402 receipt number 84637038303.), filed by Michael Ryan Neithardt. (Attachments: #1 Attachment, #2 Civil Cover Sheet)(dg3s, Deputy Clerk)
|
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Maryland District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
