Islam v. Blinken et al
| Monirul Islam |
| ANTHONY J BLINKEN, MERRICK B GARLAND, Secretary ALEJANDRO MAYORKAS, Richard C. Visek, Julie M. Tufft, Mary Cheng, THOMAS D SMITHMAN, ROBERT NEEDHAM, Anthony J. Blinken, Merrick B. Garland, Alejandro Mayorkas and Thomas D. Smithman |
| 1:2022cv01287 |
| May 30, 2022 |
| US District Court for the District of Maryland |
| Ellen Lipton Hollander |
| Other Immigration Actions |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on June 30, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 5
MARGINAL ORDER approving #4 Joint Stipulation of Voluntary Dismissal filed by Monirul Islam. Signed by District Judge Ellen Lipton Hollander on 6/30/2022. (kk5s, Deputy Clerk)
|
| Filing 4 STIPULATION of Dismissal by Monirul Islam(Mahajan, Timothy) |
| Filing 3 NOTICE of Appearance by Alicia Leigh Shelton on behalf of All Defendants (Shelton, Alicia) |
| Filing 2 Summons Issued 60 days as to Anthony J. Blinken, Mary Cheng, Merrick B. Garland, Alejandro Mayorkas, Robert Needham, Thomas D. Smithman, Julie M. Tufft, Richard C. Visek, U.S. Attorney and U.S. Attorney General(kk5s, Deputy Clerk) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against All Defendants ( Filing fee $ 402 receipt number AMDDC-9961562.), filed by Monirul Islam. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Summons, #3 Exhibit)(Mahajan, Timothy) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Maryland District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
