McDowell v. Tate
| Randolph McDowell |
| Gwendolyn S. Tate |
| Shavette Conigland |
| 1:2022cv01435 |
| June 13, 2022 |
| US District Court for the District of Maryland |
| Lydia Kay Griggsby |
| Julie Rebecca Rubin |
| Civil Rights: Other |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 dp Civil Right Denial of Due Process |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on July 13, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 4
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER dismissing complaints in LKG-22-1435 and LKG-22-1436 for lack of subject matter jurisdiction; granting motions for Leave to Proceed in Forma Pauperis; denying motions for Appointment of Counsel; granting Motions to Consolidate; closing cases. Signed by Judge Lydia Kay Griggsby on 7/13/2022. Associated Cases: 1:22-cv-01435-LKG, 1:22-cv-01436-LKG (dass, Deputy Clerk) (c/m 7/14/22)
|
| Case Reassigned to Judge Lydia Kay Griggsby. Judge Julie Rebecca Rubin no longer assigned to the case. (kns, Deputy Clerk) |
| Filing 3 LETTER MOTION to Appoint Counsel and Consolidate Cases 22-1435 and 22-1436 by Randolph McDowell. (dass, Deputy Clerk) |
| Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Randolph McDowell. (dass, Deputy Clerk) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Gwendolyn S. Tate, filed by Randolph McDowell. (Attachments: #1 Certificate of Service)(dass, Deputy Clerk) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Maryland District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
