Chowdhury et al v. Mayorkas et al
| Arunabh Chowdhury and Debasmita Roy |
| Alejandro Mayorkas, Merrick B. Garland, Mary Cheng, Ur Mendoza Jaddou, Richard C. Visek, Loren K. Miller and Terri Robinson |
| 1:2022cv01568 |
| June 26, 2022 |
| US District Court for the District of Maryland |
| Lydia Kay Griggsby |
| Other Immigration Actions |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on July 29, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 6
MARGINAL ORDER approving #4 Motion for Voluntary Dismissal filed by Debasmita Roy, Arunabh Chowdhury. Signed by Judge Lydia Kay Griggsby on 7/29/2022. (kk5s, Deputy Clerk)
|
| Filing 5 NOTICE of Appearance by Alicia Leigh Shelton on behalf of All Defendants (Shelton, Alicia) |
| Filing 4 STIPULATION of Dismissal by Arunabh Chowdhury, Debasmita Roy(Mahajan, Timothy) |
|
Filing 3
CASE MANAGEMENT ORDER. Signed by Judge Lydia Kay Griggsby on 6/27/2022. (mg4s, Chambers)
|
| Filing 2 Summons Issued 60 days as to Mary Cheng, Merrick B. Garland, Ur Mendoza Jaddou, Alejandro Mayorkas, Loren K. Miller, Terri Robinson, Richard C. Visek, U.S. Attorney and U.S. Attorney General(jb5s, Deputy Clerk) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against All Defendants ( Filing fee $ 402 receipt number AMDDC-10013156.), filed by Arunabh Chowdhury, Debasmita Roy. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Exhibit, #3 Summons)(Mahajan, Timothy) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Maryland District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
