Smutney v. Interactive Marketing Fulfillment, LLC et al
| Hannah E Smutney |
| Interactive Marketing Fulfillment, LLC and Warwick Fulfillment Solutions. LLC |
| 1:2022cv01569 |
| June 26, 2022 |
| US District Court for the District of Maryland |
| Lydia Kay Griggsby |
| Civil Rights: Americans with Disabilities - Employment |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on July 21, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 7
SCHEDULING ORDER. Signed by Judge Lydia Kay Griggsby on 7/21/2022. (js6s, Chambers)
|
| Filing 6 ANSWER to #1 Complaint by Interactive Marketing Fulfillment, LLC, Warwick Fulfillment Solutions. LLC. (Attachments: #1 Corporate Disclosure, #2 Corporate Disclosure)(Schulman, Robert) |
|
Filing 5
CASE MANAGEMENT ORDER. Signed by Judge Lydia Kay Griggsby on 6/27/2022. (mg4s, Chambers)
|
| Filing 4 Summons Issued 21 days as to Interactive Marketing Fulfillment, LLC, Warwick Fulfillment Solutions. LLC. (Attachments: #1 Summons)(kb3s, Deputy Clerk) |
| Filing 3 Local Rule 103.3 Disclosure Statement by Hannah E Smutney (Neal, Stephen) |
| Filing 2 NOTICE of Appearance by Stephen Lybrook Neal, Jr on behalf of Hannah E Smutney (Neal, Stephen) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Hannah E Smutney ( Filing fee $ 402 receipt number BMDDC-10013192.), filed by Hannah E Smutney. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Summons, #3 Summons)(Neal, Stephen) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Maryland District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
