Zapf et al v. Smith & Nephew, Inc.
| Wesley Zapf and Janeen Zapf |
| Smith & Nephew, Inc. |
| 1:2022cv02066 |
| August 16, 2022 |
| US District Court for the District of Maryland |
| Catherine C Blake |
| Personal Inj. Prod. Liability |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Product Liability |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on October 11, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 4 NOTICE by Smith & Nephew, Inc. of Filing Updated Listings of Pending BHR and THA Track Cases (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A (BHR Track Cases), #2 Exhibit B (THA Track Cases))Associated Cases: 1:17-md-02775-CCB et al.(Spira, Daniel) |
Filing 3
ORDER confirming the results of the conference call held on Tuesday, September 27, 2022. Signed by Judge Catherine C. Blake on 9/29/2022. Associated Cases: 1:17-md-02775-CCB et al.(bmhs, Deputy Clerk)
|
| Filing 2 NOTICE by Smith & Nephew, Inc. of Filing Updated Listings of Pending BHR and THA Track Cases (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A (BHR Track Cases), #2 Exhibit B (THA Track Cases))Associated Cases: 1:17-md-02775-CCB et al.(Spira, Daniel) |
| Cases associated: Create association to 1:17-md-02775-CCB. (bmhs, Deputy Clerk) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT THA Track against Smith & Nephew, Inc. ( Filing fee $ 402 receipt number AMDDC-10104389.), filed by Wesley Zapf. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(Shannon, Chad) |
| Case Assigned to Judge Catherine C. Blake. (kos, Deputy Clerk) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Maryland District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
