Njie-Litumbe et al v. United States Citizenship and Immigration Services et al
| Lawrence Nara Njie-Litumbe and Ashley Kimora Lloyd |
| United States Citizenship and Immigration Services, Director Ur Mendoza Jaddou, District Director Greg Collett, US Attorney General Merrick B. Garland, US Attorney General Erek L. Barron, Ur Mendoza Jaddou, Greg Collett, Merrick B. Garland and Erek L. Barron |
| 1:2022cv02237 |
| September 6, 2022 |
| US District Court for the District of Maryland |
| Catherine C Blake |
| Other Immigration Actions |
| 8 U.S.C. ยง 1255 Immigration: Failure USCIS To Adjudicate Permanent Residency Petition |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on September 7, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 2 Summons Issued 60 days as to Erek L. Barron, Greg Collett, Merrick B. Garland, Ur Mendoza Jaddou, United States Citizenship and Immigration Services, U.S. Attorney and U.S. Attorney General(kk5s, Deputy Clerk) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Erek L. Barron, Greg Collett, Merrick B. Garland, Ur Mendoza Jaddou, United States Citizenship and Immigration Services ( Filing fee $ 402 receipt number AMDDC-10138072.), filed by Lawrence Nara Njie-Litumbe, Ashley Kimora Lloyd. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Summons Summons, #3 Summons Summons, #4 Summons Summons, #5 Summons Summons, #6 Summons Summons)(Whitaker, Nicole) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Maryland District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
