Ransom v. Mayorkas et al
| Eyphra Ransom |
| Alejandro Mayorkas and Deanne Criswell |
| 1:2022cv02355 |
| September 15, 2022 |
| US District Court for the District of Maryland |
| George Levi Russell |
| Civil Rights: Jobs |
| 05 U.S.C. ยง 706 Judicial Review of Agency Action |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on February 7, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 5
ORDER DIRECTING plaintiff to submit completed summons to the Clerk and the Clerk shall issue summons and return summons to plaintiff. Signed by Judge George Levi Russell, III on 10/13/2022. (Attachments: #1 Summons) (hmls, Deputy Clerk)
|
|
Filing 4
Consent to receive notice and service electronically by Eyphra Ransom. The Court recommends that all documents received electronically be printed or saved for future reference.(dass, Deputy Clerk)
|
|
Filing 3
New Case Notification Letter sent to Eyphra Ransom. (dass, Deputy Clerk) (c/hd to plaintiff)
|
|
Filing 2
(Document did not attach) New Case Notification Letter sent to Eyphra Ransom. (dass, Deputy Clerk) (c/hd to pro se plaintiff) Modified on 9/21/2022 (dass, Deputy Clerk).
|
|
Filing 1
COMPLAINT against Deanne Criswell, Alejandro Mayorkas (Filing fee $ 402 receipt number 1575), filed by Eyphra Ransom. (Attachments: #1 Statement of Facts, #2 Initial Decision, #3 Decision, #4 Civil Cover Sheet, #5 Receipt)(dass, Deputy Clerk)
|
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Maryland District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
