Jarosz v. Jarosz
Donnamarie Jarosz |
Kasimier Jarosz |
1:2022cv02594 |
October 11, 2022 |
US District Court for the District of Maryland |
Lydia Kay Griggsby |
Stockholders Suits |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity - Stockholders Suits |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on September 15, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 13 MOTION to Dismiss Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(b)(1) and 12(b)(6) by Kasimier Jarosz (Attachments: #1 Memorandum in Support, #2 Exhibit 1, #3 Exhibit 2, #4 Exhibit 3, #5 Exhibit 4, #6 Exhibit 5, #7 Text of Proposed Order)(Ulwick, James) |
Filing 12 SCHEDULING ORDER setting briefing deadlines. Signed by Judge Lydia Kay Griggsby on 11/15/2022. (dg3s, Deputy Clerk) |
Filing 11 Substantive legal issues - addressing (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1, #2 Exhibit 2)(Ulwick, James) |
Filing 10 NOTICE of Appearance by Jean Evelyn Lewis on behalf of Kasimier Jarosz (Lewis, Jean) |
Filing 9 PAPERLESS ORDER Granting #8 Motion for Extension of Time. Signed by Judge Lydia Kay Griggsby on 11/14/2022. (mg4s, Chambers) |
Filing 8 Consent MOTION for Extension of Time to Respond to Complaint by Kasimier Jarosz(Ulwick, James) |
Filing 7 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Donnamarie Jarosz. Kasimier Jarosz served on 10/15/2022, answer due 11/7/2022.(Scherr, Jason) |
Filing 6 QC NOTICE: #5 Affidavit of Service, filed by Donnamarie Jarosz was filed incorrectly. **Incorrect event used. Please refile using Summons Returned Executed. It has been noted as FILED IN ERROR, and the document link has been disabled. (ols, Deputy Clerk) |
Filing 5 -FILED IN ERROR- AFFIDAVIT of Service for Summons, Disclosure of Corporate Interest, Case Management Order, Civil Cover Sheet, and Verified Complaint with Exhibits served on Defendant Kasimier Jarosz on 10/15/2022, filed by Donnamarie Jarosz.(Scherr, Jason) Modified on 10/31/2022 (ols, Deputy Clerk). |
Filing 4 CASE MANAGEMENT ORDER. Signed by Judge Lydia Kay Griggsby on 10/13/2022. (mg4s, Chambers) |
Filing 3 Summons Issued 21 days as to Kasimier Jarosz. (ols, Deputy Clerk) |
Filing 2 Local Rule 103.3 Disclosure Statement by Donnamarie Jarosz (Scherr, Jason) Modified on 10/11/2022 (ols, Deputy Clerk). |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT (Verified) against Kasimier Jarosz ( Filing fee $ 402 receipt number AMDDC-10200848.), filed by Donnamarie Jarosz. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A - PSA, #2 Exhibit B - Contempt Order, #3 Exhibit C - Demand Pursuant to Va. Code 13.2-672.1, #4 Civil Cover Sheet, #5 Summons)(Scherr, Jason) Modified on 10/11/2022 (ols, Deputy Clerk). |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Maryland District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Jarosz v. Jarosz | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff: Donnamarie Jarosz | |
Represented By: | Jason R Scherr |
Represented By: | Patrick Alan Harvey |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant: Kasimier Jarosz | |
Represented By: | James P Ulwick |
Represented By: | Jean Evelyn Lewis |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.