Mompoho Deho v. Renaud et al
| Pierre Mompoho Deho |
| Acting Secretary Tracy Renaud, Greg Collett, Ur Jaddou and Alejandro Mayorkas |
| 1:2022cv02950 |
| November 15, 2022 |
| US District Court for the District of Maryland |
| George Levi Russell |
| Other Immigration Actions |
| 08 U.S.C. ยง 1329 Immigration: Writ of Mandamus to Adjudicate Visa Petition |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on December 21, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 4
ORDER granting #3 Consent MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer Greg Collett answer due 3/23/2023; Ur Jaddou answer due 3/23/2023; Alejandro Mayorkas answer due 3/23/2023; Tracy Renaud answer due 3/23/2023.. Signed by Judge George Levi Russell, III on 12/21/2022. (bas, Deputy Clerk)
|
| Filing 3 Consent MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer by Greg Collett, Ur Jaddou, Alejandro Mayorkas, Tracy Renaud (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order)(Wilson, Michael) |
| Filing 2 Summons Issued 60 days as to Greg Collett, Ur Jaddou, Alejandro Mayorkas, Tracy Renaud, U.S. Attorney and U.S. Attorney General(bas, Deputy Clerk) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against All Defendants ( Filing fee $ 402 receipt number AMDDC-10269277.), filed by Pierre Mompoho Deho. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Summons, #3 Summons, #4 Summons, #5 Summons, #6 Summons, #7 Summons)(Griffith, Raymond) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Maryland District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
