Wine v. Phoenix Insurance Company
| Justin Wine |
| Phoenix Insurance Company |
| 1:2022cv03360 |
| December 29, 2022 |
| US District Court for the District of Maryland |
| Ellen Lipton Hollander |
| Insurance |
| 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Insurance Contract |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on February 21, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 20
ORDER Scheduling a Conference call for March 28, 2023, at 4:00 p.m.. Signed by District Judge Ellen Lipton Hollander on 2/21/2023. (c/m 2/21/2023 bas, Deputy Clerk)
|
| Deficiency Notice as to Phoenix Insurance Company -- Your Local Rule 103.3 disclosure statement has not been filed. The Statement must be filed by 2/28/2023 (bas, Deputy Clerk) |
| Filing 19 ANSWER to #1 Complaint,,, by Phoenix Insurance Company.(Gollogly, Ezra) |
|
Filing 18
ORDER Granting #17 Motion for Extension of Time. Signed by District Judge Ellen Lipton Hollander on 1/25/2023. (c/m 1/25/2023 bas, Deputy Clerk)
|
| Filing 17 MOTION for Extension of Time to Respond to Plaintiff's Complaint by Phoenix Insurance Company (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order Proposed Order)(Gollogly, Ezra) |
| Filing 16 NOTICE of Appearance by Megan Lynn Micco on behalf of Phoenix Insurance Company (Micco, Megan) |
| Filing 15 NOTICE of Appearance by Ezra Gollogly on behalf of Phoenix Insurance Company (Gollogly, Ezra) |
| Filing 14 Correspondence sent to Defendant re: Removal Notification. (c/m 12/29/2022 bas, Deputy Clerk) . |
| Filing 13 Correspondence sent to Plaintiff re: Removal Notification. (c/m 12/29/2022 bas, Deputy Clerk) |
| Filing 12 Correspondence sent to Plaintiff re: Removal Notification. (c/m 12/29/2022 bas, Deputy Clerk) |
| Filing 11 Case transferred in from District of Florida Southern; Case Number 1:22-cv-20550. Original file certified copy of transfer order and docket sheet received. |
|
Filing 10
ORDER granting #4 Motion to Change Venue, transferring to District of Maryland. Signed by Judge Kathleen M. Williams on 12/28/2022. See attached document for full details. (pc)
|
| Civil Case Terminated. Closing Case. (pc) |
| Filing 9 Joint SCHEDULING REPORT - Rule 16.1 by Justin Wine (Litvak, Uri) |
| Filing 8 Notice of Ninety Days Expiring by Justin Wine re #4 Defendant's MOTION to Change Venue and For Extension of Time to Respond to Complaint, with Incorporated Memorandum of Law filed by Phoenix Insurance Company (Bobadilla, Diego) |
| Referral to Magistrate Judge Chris M. McAliley for all discovery disputes and non-dispositive pretrial motions per DE 7. Motions referred to Judge Chris M. McAliley. (vjk) |
|
Filing 7
PAPERLESS ORDER. THIS MATTER is before the Court sua sponte. Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 636 and the Magistrate Rules of the Local Rules for the Southern District of Florida, it is ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that all discovery disputes and non-dispositive pretrial motions in this matter are REFERRED to U.S. Magistrate Judge Chris M. McAliley. It is further ordered that the Parties shall adhere to the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, the Local Rules for the Southern District of Florida, Judge Williams's Court Practices and Procedures, and Judge McAliley's Discovery Procedures. Judge Williams's Court Practices and Procedures and Judge McAliley's Discovery Procedures are available online at the Court's website: #http://www.flsd.uscourts.gov/content/judge-kathleen-m-williams. Non-compliance with any provision of this Order, the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, the Local Rules, or this Court's Practices and Procedures may subject the offending party to sanctions, including dismissal of this case. It is the duty of all counsel to take all actions necessary to comply with this Order.Finally, the Court advises the Parties that #4 Defendant's Motion to Change Venue and for an Extension of Time to Respond to the Complaint remains pending before the Court and will be ruled on shortly. If the Court denies the Motion in part or in full, the Court will enter an order requiring the Parties to submit additional documents and information to the Court. Signed by Judge Kathleen M. Williams on 9/19/2022. (sgm)
|
| Filing 6 Defendant's REPLY to Response to Motion re #4 Defendant's MOTION to Change Venue and For Extension of Time to Respond to Complaint, with Incorporated Memorandum of Law filed by Phoenix Insurance Company. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Ex. A - EUO Excerpts, #2 Exhibit Ex. B - Response to CRN)(Ebenfeld, Cindy) |
| Filing 5 RESPONSE in Opposition re #4 Defendant's MOTION to Change Venue and For Extension of Time to Respond to Complaint, with Incorporated Memorandum of Law filed by Justin Wine. Replies due by 3/16/2022. (Attachments: #1 Affidavit Affidavit of Justin Wine, #2 Exhibit Filed Civil Remedy Notic)(Litvak, Uri) |
| Filing 4 Defendant's MOTION to Change Venue and For Extension of Time to Respond to Complaint, with Incorporated Memorandum of Law by Phoenix Insurance Company. Responses due by 3/16/2022 (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Comp. Ex. A - Corporate Records, #2 Exhibit Comp. Ex. B - Declaration of Nadine Vines with 2 letters attached)(Ebenfeld, Cindy) |
| Filing 3 NOTICE of Change of Address, Email or Law Firm Name by Uri Litvak (Litvak, Uri) |
| Filing 2 Clerks Notice of Judge Assignment to Judge Kathleen M. Williams. Pursuant to 28 USC 636(c), the parties are hereby notified that the U.S. Magistrate Judge Chris M. McAliley is available to handle any or all proceedings in this case. If agreed, parties should complete and file the Consent form found on our website. It is not necessary to file a document indicating lack of consent. Pro se (NON-PRISONER) litigants may receive Notices of Electronic Filings (NEFS) via email after filing a Consent by Pro Se Litigant (NON-PRISONER) to Receive Notices of Electronic Filing. The consent form is available under the forms section of our website. (mab) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL (STATE COURT COMPLAINT - Complaint for Civil Damages and Jury Demand) Filing fee $402.00. Pay.gov Agency Tracking ID FLSDC-15423927, payment transferred from : 22CV20548, filed by Phoenix Insurance Company. No Answer Filed/ No Motion to Dismiss Filed in State Court. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Exhibit Ex. A - Complaint with policy excerpts, #3 Exhibit Ex. B - Notice of Service of Process, #4 Exhibit Ex. C - Transcript excerpts, #5 Exhibit Ex. D - Summons, #6 Exhibit Ex. E - Issued Summons, #7 Exhibit Ex. F - State Civil Cover Sheet, #8 Exhibit Ex. G - State Docket Sheet, #9 Exhibit Ex. H - Return of Service, #10 Exhibit Ex. I - Notice of Appearance)(Ebenfeld, Cindy) Text Modified on 2/24/2022 (mab). |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Maryland District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Wine v. Phoenix Insurance Company | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Justin Wine | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Phoenix Insurance Company | |
| Represented By: | Ezra Gollogly |
| Represented By: | Megan Lynn Micco |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
