Copez v. Pratt et al
| Marquis C. Copez |
| Officer Ryan Pratt, Markel Spencer and Lee Brown |
| 1:2023cv00019 |
| January 5, 2023 |
| US District Court for the District of Maryland |
| Ellen Lipton Hollander |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on February 23, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 6 Prisoner Trust Fund Account Statement by Marquis C. Copez (Attachments: #1 Attachment, #2 Envelope)(ybs, Deputy Clerk) |
Filing 5
ORDER granting Plaintiff 21 days o file an amended complaint and pay the full filing fee or file a motion to proceed in forma pauperis. Signed by District Judge Ellen Lipton Hollander on 2/23/2023. (c/m a forms 2/23/2023 ybs, Deputy Clerk)
|
| Filing 4 Supplement to #1 Complaint filed by Marquis C. Copez. (Attachments: #1 Envelope) (hmls, Deputy Clerk) |
|
Filing 3
ORDER granting Plaintiff 28 days to file and Amended Complaint and a Motion to Proceed in Forma Pauperis. Signed by District Judge Ellen Lipton Hollander on 1/9/2023. (c/m w forms 1/10/2023 ybs, Deputy Clerk)
|
| Filing 2 New Case Notification Letter sent to Marquis C. Copez. (c/m P, 1/6/2023) (kos, Deputy Clerk) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Lee Brown, Ryan Pratt, Markel Spencer, filed by Marquis C. Copez. (Attachments: #1 Envelope)(kos, Deputy Clerk) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Maryland District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
